I am not disputing that an estimate of the angle might very well be wrong, but my question is basically so what? Maybe I could phrase it better, but I do not get the overall significance of this point in the bigger picture
I don't know how many times I have to tell you, a defence lawyer doesn't get to be a jury on his own case, it's unethical!
Taking the average of the three WCC 6.5mm bullets weighed by FBI agent Robert Frazier and subtracting the weight of CE-399:
Taking the average of the three WCC 6.5mm bullets weighed by FBI agent Robert Frazier and subtracting the weight of CE-399:160.85 + 161.5 + 161.1 grains = 483.45483.45 ? 3 = 161.15 grains161.15 - 158.6 = 2.55 grains missing from CE-399
Speaking of non sequiturs. the idea that no fragments would exist in chest where the bullet fractured a rib, but instead the only fragments would be near the much smaller bones in the wrist certainly meets the criteria for me
So CE-399 was slightly below avg in mass if your numbers are accurate, which I doubt. But where on the MB did the fragments originate from? The MB looked slightly flattened and not missing any material to me. What is the variance of mass with a FMJ bullet of this type anyway? When you find that out, let's talk.