Autopsy proves SBT impossible

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Autopsy proves SBT impossible  (Read 162650 times)

Offline Mike Orr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 401
Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #126 on: May 05, 2018, 07:40:09 PM »
      Jim B.
Dr. Humes : Well , I was summoned from my home late in afternoon of that day (Nov.22,1963) by the Surgeon General of the Navy and the Commanding officer of the Naval Medical Center, and the Commanding Officer of the Navy Medical school, and much to my surprise, was told that the body of the late President was being brought to our laboratories and that I was to examine the President and ascertain his cause of death.

        mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/m_j_russ/hscahume.htm
 

Offline Matt Grantham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 902
Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #127 on: May 05, 2018, 09:06:02 PM »
Autopsy proves SBT impossible ??

Not even close.

If one accepts that JFK's back wound was an entry wound and that no bullet was found in the body, it stands to reason that the bullet transversed his body and could have gone on to strike JBC. 

So, no, the autopsy doesn't prove the SBT impossible.

I guess it's possible that somehow the bullet that entered JFK's back fell out and was never recovered, but that leaves the CTs another conundrum.

If the bullet that struck JFK in the back did not pass through his body and the throat wound is indeed an entrance wound, then where did the bullet that caused the throat wound go ?

I'm sure one of the geniuses here that claim the SBT is an impossibility has a logical answer.

 James Young was a Navy doctor in 63


?Letter From James Young to Gerald Ford (Excerpted)

Dear President Ford,

I was active-duty Navy and assigned to the White House as White House Physician in 1963, when President Kennedy was assassinated?

Knowing that you were on the Warren Commission at that time, I am writing to you confidentially, to see if you have any knowledge about an issue which has puzzled me for years?

My particular problem is a description of what occurred at the autopsy. During the autopsy examination, Dr. Jim Humes, then the Chief of Pathology at Bethesda Naval Hospital, and two other pathologists stated that some pieces of President Kennedy?s skull bones were missing. In order to reconstruct the President?s head for burial, Dr. Humes wanted to find those pieces which were missing. Dr. Burkley and I requested two of our corpsmen who were assigned to our White House medical unit, to go to the Executive Office Building where the Secret Service had placed the ?Queen Mary,? the open convertible in which President Kennedy had been shot, for bone fragments.

Two of the corpsmen left and returned sometime later with three varying sized pieces of President Kennedy?s skull bones. In addition, they brought back in an envelope a spent misshapen bullet which they had found on the back floor of the ?Queen Mary? where they had found the pieces of skull bones. The bullet and pieces of skull were given to Dr. Jim Humes.

« Last Edit: May 06, 2018, 01:10:06 AM by Matt Grantham »

Offline Jim Brunsman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 131
Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #128 on: May 06, 2018, 12:56:36 AM »
Thanks Mike. I was aware of Humes' testimony on this matter, but I wondered if LBJ or one of his minions called....

Offline Jim Brunsman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 131
Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #129 on: May 06, 2018, 01:16:24 AM »
The newbie is not only arrogant but misinformed. Do your research on what the autopsy witnesses said. There was considerable confusion about how the back wound did not exit the president. Again, tired of explaining this, but unless you can manufacture another wound on the rear of the president's body that DID exit on the front, the imbecilic SBT is COMPLETELY OBLITERATED. Never mind all the other evidence that shows the theory is total nonsense. The official autopsy report is such a pack of lies, it should be featured in every forensic textbook as an example of how NOT to conduct an autopsy.
You state:
"If one accepts that JFK's back wound was an entry wound and that no bullet was found in the body, it stands to reason that the bullet transversed his body and could have gone on to strike JBC." No, remember, Humes probed the wound and could feel the end of it with his finger. THE BULLET DID NOT TRAVERSE THE BODY. How could this bullet have been a threat to JBC? Come on SBT folks, let's hear more nonsense explanations of this!

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #130 on: May 06, 2018, 01:30:40 AM »
The newbie is not only arrogant but misinformed. Do your research on what the autopsy witnesses said. There was considerable confusion about how the back wound did not exit the president. Again, tired of explaining this, but unless you can manufacture another wound on the rear of the president's body that DID exit on the front, the imbecilic SBT is COMPLETELY OBLITERATED. Never mind all the other evidence that shows the theory is total nonsense. The official autopsy report is such a pack of lies, it should be featured in every forensic textbook as an example of how NOT to conduct an autopsy.
You state:
"If one accepts that JFK's back wound was an entry wound and that no bullet was found in the body, it stands to reason that the bullet transversed his body and could have gone on to strike JBC." No, remember, Humes probed the wound and could feel the end of it with his finger. THE BULLET DID NOT TRAVERSE THE BODY. How could this bullet have been a threat to JBC? Come on SBT folks, let's hear more nonsense explanations of this!

You are a BLOWHARD. The SBT has in no way been obliterated. It hasn't even been scratched.

Offline Matt Grantham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 902
Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #131 on: May 06, 2018, 01:46:57 AM »
The newbie is not only arrogant but misinformed. Do your research on what the autopsy witnesses said. There was considerable confusion about how the back wound did not exit the president. Again, tired of explaining this, but unless you can manufacture another wound on the rear of the president's body that DID exit on the front, the imbecilic SBT is COMPLETELY OBLITERATED. Never mind all the other evidence that shows the theory is total nonsense. The official autopsy report is such a pack of lies, it should be featured in every forensic textbook as an example of how NOT to conduct an autopsy.
You state:
"If one accepts that JFK's back wound was an entry wound and that no bullet was found in the body, it stands to reason that the bullet transversed his body and could have gone on to strike JBC." No, remember, Humes probed the wound and could feel the end of it with his finger. THE BULLET DID NOT TRAVERSE THE BODY. How could this bullet have been a threat to JBC? Come on SBT folks, let's hear more nonsense explanations of this!

 Don't forget that the missing X ray from Bethesda was supposedly an image of JFK's upper lung, so it is possible the bullet id inside of JFK's chest IMO

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #132 on: May 06, 2018, 02:10:10 AM »
Don't forget that the missing X ray from Bethesda was supposedly an image of JFK's upper lung, so it is possible the bullet id inside of JFK's chest IMO

There is no missing x-ray.