Autopsy proves SBT impossible

[Andrew Mason]

CE 399 already had problems and you want to add that the  leftover 2.2 grains could account for what was in Connally, the damage to the interior of windshield, and the fragment that hit Tague?

No. CE399 was the first shot. The second fragmented as I said.

[Andrew Mason]

There were so many errors in your post, I don't know where to start. So I will respond only to item #3) second and third shot were very close together. Are you "Oswald Framers" so blind that you don't see what this means? It takes time to operate the bolt of the "humanitarian rifle." YOU CAN'T HAVE A SINGLE ASSASSIN AND TWO SHOTS VERY CLOSE TOGETHER, RIGHT? This could be done with an automatic rifle, but not a bolt action rifle. If you have two shots close together, you have two assassins. But again, this is only one of a startling number of reasons why the magic bullet is a scientific impossibility.

If the second shot was just before JFK's hair flies up, which was seen to occur by Hickey on the second shot, (which is just before Greer turns around for the first time, which he said he did immediately after the second shot)  then the second shot was about z271-272.  That fits the shot pattern: 1 ..........(4 seconds).........2..(2.3 seconds)..3

2.3 seconds between 2 and 3, is enough time for Oswald to fire all the shots.

[Andrew Mason]

Dr. SHAW - This was a small wound approximately a centimeter and a half in its greatest diameter. It was roughly elliptical. It was just medial to the axilliary fold or the crease of the armpit, but we could tell that this wound, the depth of the wound, had not penetrated the shoulder blade.


Given the alignment of JBC and JFK in the car and the use of jacketed military ammunition, how do you explain the location and trajectory of the elliptical wound in JBC's back if the bullet does not first pass through JFK?

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/e3/10/ba/e310ba335fae65b3df49948208ac1866--kennedy-assassination-the-kennedys.jpg

An elliptical wound is made by a non-yawing bullet striking at an angle to the target surface. A yawing or tumbling bullet makes either a bullet shaped entry mark or an asymmetrical ovoid (egg) shape. At z272 the car alignment and JFK's leftward movement allowed a shot from the SN to strike only JBC, just missing JFK's head. Hickey observed JFK's hair fly up at the moment of the second shot.

[Andrew Mason]

Most likely struck concrete to the right rear of the limo and was never recovered.

Now you tell me, if the SBT is incorrect....what happened to the bullet that hit JFK in the back....and if the throat wound wasn't an exit wound what caused that wound and what happened to that bullet ?

If you think the SBT is wrong - come up with something better.

According to the trajectory, it went to JBC's left side. It did not appear to strike the car. So it struck JBC on the left side.

Not only has the SBT not been proven wrong, the more you study the assassination, the more obvious it becomes that it's the only truly viable theory that explains what we see in Zapruder and the wounds to both men.

It is disproved by the evidence. There is a much simpler explanation that fits the evidence and, of course, that Oswald fired all three shots.

[Howard Gee]

According to the trajectory, it went to JBC's left side. It did not appear to strike the car. So it struck JBC on the left side.
It is disproved by the evidence. There is a much simpler explanation that fits the evidence and, of course, that Oswald fired all three shots.

You're correct about the 3 shots but the rest of your analysis is seriously flawed.

You have the first shot hitting JFK and going where ?  Hitting JBC on the left side ?

Makes no sense.

[Jack Nessan]

You already asked this. Was there something in the answer you did not agree with?

What answer? No answer is an an answer. The only explanation there is for JBC's wound is a bullet passing through JFK. Despite all the posturing and gnashing of teeth about how impossible it was for one bullet to cause all the wounds, in the end it is the only possible answer there is. It seems to be a lot easier to question the actions of the WC and DPD and the vaguery of what they should have done, than it is to actually explain the mechanics of the assassination.



HSCA Trajectory Analysis.
Mr. SAWYER. If we were to start at the other end then and assume that a bullet were fired at the approximate time we have determined from the sixth floor of the depository, would it have of necessity given the wounds in the President, would it of necessity, based on what you have determined as to locations somewhat, also have hit Governor Connally?
Mr. CANNING. The bullet would have had to have been substantially deflected by passing through the President in order to miss the Governor. It seems almost inevitable that the Governor would be hit with the alinements that we have found.
Mr. SAWYER. So that if we assume, as apparently is the fact, that this jacketed bullet did not hit anything solid in the way of bone in the President but only traversed the soft tissue of the neck, and presuming the approximate location of the limousine at the time and the posture as nearly as can be determined of the President at that time, that in your view then, absent a deflection of that bullet, it could not have missed Governor Connally.
Mr. CANNING. That is my view, yes.

[Andrew Mason]

You're correct about the 3 shots but the rest of your analysis is seriously flawed.

You have the first shot hitting JFK and going where ?  Hitting JBC on the left side ?

Makes no sense.

It went to the left of JBC's midline, according to the trajectory and the observed positions of the two men. JBC had one wound on the left side. What does not make sense?