Autopsy proves SBT impossible

[Howard Gee]

Can I use the same lame excuse?  "Most likely it was never recovered".

What do you mean "we", kimosabe?

See if you can keep up.  I said 'most likely hit concrete'. Not 'most likely never recovered'.

What do you think happened to the 'missed shot' ?

[John Iacoletti]

See if you can keep up.  I said 'most likely hit concrete'. Not 'most likely never recovered'.

So the bullet that hit JFK in the back was never recovered.  See how easy that is by your standards?

What do you think happened to the 'missed shot' ?

What missed shot?  How do you know there was one?

[Howard Gee]

So the bullet that hit JFK in the back was never recovered.  See how easy that is by your standards?

What missed shot?  How do you know there was one?

No, the bullet that hit JFK in the back was recovered. CE399.

You're the one that asked about the 'missed shot'.

I responded.

Feel free to outline your sequence of shots fired, location of shooter(s), and where the bullets wound up.

[John Iacoletti]

No, the bullet that hit JFK in the back was recovered. CE399.

LOL.  And your evidence that CE399 hit JFK in the back would be ...?

[Matt Grantham]

 Howard Welcome to the round and round

[Tim Nickerson]

Did Gimp compensate for the oblique view?

The obliqueness of the view is too minor to matter.

[Tim Nickerson]

CE 399 already had problems and you want to add that the  leftover 2.2 grains could account for what was in Connally, the damage to the interior of windshield, and the fragment that hit Tague?

Matt , you are confused. What do the fragment that hit Tague and the damage to the windshield have to do with CE-399?