Before the sun had set on 11-22-1963, they had their man.
He was a lone gunman. No need to look at conspiracy. Further investigation...un-necessary.
Oswald was already convicted of the assassination long before all of this re-enactment/analysis/ stuff ever transpired.
The Warren Commission just needed to glaze the cake that had been baked that afternoon.
So I resent being called a 'conspiracy theorist' [just because I don't believe the government's Report]...when in fact the government case against Oswald was itself based upon a theory.
There was a massive cover-up and concealment of anything that would or might exonerate Oswald.
That just simply is no theory.
Now me...if I wanted to shoot someone riding in that open car with that rifle...from that window, and make sure I finished him, I would have plugged him at the turn onto Elm St...once between the eyes and then down right through the head for good measure.
So...c'mon 
The government case against Oswald was itself based upon a ton of evidence. That Conspiracy buffs like yourself refuse to accept that evidence is fine but don't expect reasonable people to take you seriously.