Can anybody provide proof of a successful reenactment of Oswald's feat?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Can anybody provide proof of a successful reenactment of Oswald's feat?  (Read 139082 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Can anybody provide proof of a successful reenactment of Oswald's feat?
« Reply #28 on: April 10, 2018, 09:16:47 PM »
Fragments, not fragment. And Frazier does explain how he came to the conclusion that the fragments came from Oswald's rifle.

"Oswald's rifle".  LOL.

But how does any of this tell you that the fragments allegedly found in the limo were from the head shot?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Can anybody provide proof of a successful reenactment of Oswald's feat?
« Reply #29 on: April 10, 2018, 09:18:49 PM »
Well, that's all I needed to know about Frazier. What forensic test did he use to determine the "fragments" came from the MC? Ballistic lines on the fragments? HA! Show me the analysis.

He lined the marks up in his mind even though they did not actually physically line up in the microscope.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Can anybody provide proof of a successful reenactment of Oswald's feat?
« Reply #30 on: April 10, 2018, 09:19:35 PM »
The guy who wrote "Kill zone" is a prevaricator.

...and the way that Tim knows this is because he doesn't like what the author said.

Offline James Dahl

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: Can anybody provide proof of a successful reenactment of Oswald's feat?
« Reply #31 on: April 12, 2018, 12:51:40 AM »
I believe the fragments were identified as being from a particular bullet from very flawed material analysis using antimony content as a basis of comparison to conclude this or that fragment was from this or that bullet.  I don't believe any of the expanding bullet fragments would still be in the vehicle for instance, they would have exited the vicinity of the car along with most of Kennedy's brain

Offline Matt Grantham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 902
Re: Can anybody provide proof of a successful reenactment of Oswald's feat?
« Reply #32 on: April 12, 2018, 02:52:48 AM »
 You might be right here is a link of a suspected bullet found on the grass at Dealy plaza on Nov 22 Roger Craig and Buddy Walthers both initially stated the object picked up the agent was a bullet lodged in some skull matter It is odd ion the picture in the link they draw a picture of what they cliam is the suspected bullet when clearly the picture shows the agent is picking up the object and cannot be seen

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/slug.htm

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Can anybody provide proof of a successful reenactment of Oswald's feat?
« Reply #33 on: April 13, 2018, 01:38:17 PM »
I believe the fragments were identified as being from a particular bullet from very flawed material analysis using antimony content as a basis of comparison to conclude this or that fragment was from this or that bullet.  I don't believe any of the expanding bullet fragments would still be in the vehicle for instance, they would have exited the vicinity of the car along with most of Kennedy's brain

I believe the fragments were identified as being from a particular bullet from very flawed material analysis using antimony content as a basis of comparison to conclude this or that fragment was from this or that bullet.

I believe that you understand that the comparison of metal of the fragments against some other bullet is utter nonsense.....  and nothing but Voo Doo Bull S   by "the experts".

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Can anybody provide proof of a successful reenactment of Oswald's feat?
« Reply #34 on: April 23, 2018, 07:57:38 PM »
Before the sun had set on 11-22-1963, they had their man.
He was a lone gunman. No need to look at conspiracy. Further investigation...un-necessary.
Oswald was already convicted of the assassination long before all of this re-enactment/analysis/ stuff ever transpired.
The Warren Commission just needed to glaze the cake that had been baked that afternoon.
So I resent being called a 'conspiracy theorist' [just because I don't believe the government's Report]...when in fact the government case against Oswald was itself based upon a theory. 
There was a massive cover-up and concealment of anything that would or might exonerate Oswald.
That just simply is no theory.

Now me...if I wanted to shoot someone riding in that open car with that rifle...from that window, and make sure I finished him, I would have plugged him at the turn onto Elm St...once between the eyes and then down right through the head for good measure.
So...c'mon    ::)