Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Prayer Woman  (Read 1238039 times)

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #903 on: October 31, 2018, 04:49:17 PM »
The  BS: comments of a RunningMouthExpert? Oh well Thumb1:

Pot and kettle. Thumb1:

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #904 on: October 31, 2018, 07:01:07 PM »
For clarification, I make no claim other than that of a Student of Research of the JohnKennedySr Assassination. And, to make conclusions based upon said study.

Offline Steve Logan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 286
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #905 on: October 31, 2018, 07:57:50 PM »
"I pity the fool"
      -Bosco B.A. Baracus-

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #906 on: October 31, 2018, 08:46:26 PM »
Nothing in there about "A-team poster" or "cutting edge top researcher".

Go figure...

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #907 on: October 31, 2018, 09:25:03 PM »
What has been known to some us for months, nay years!, viz. that Sarah Stanton is not Prayer Person, now seems generally accepted. The penny sure was slow a-droppin', but dropped it finally has. Thumb1:

Now! I would be grateful if someone could kindly tell us what, in their view, supports the theory that Prayer Person is Pauline Sanders. (Apart, that is, from the appealing fact that Pauline Sanders is not Lee Harvey Oswald.)

Thanking you in advance!

Offline Robin Unger

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 448
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #908 on: October 31, 2018, 10:09:06 PM »
Need to identify Stanton,Sanders,Davis,McCully


Offline Robin Unger

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 448
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #909 on: October 31, 2018, 10:17:45 PM »
Reese and Dean identified.