Prayer Woman

[Larry Trotter]

So what?
In the recorded images where Calvery is seen, Frazier is looking to his right.
In a logical analysis, the turn to which Frazier refers can only be a turn to the left.
Frazier must have turned to his left to listen to Sarah Stanton.
This irrefutably means that Sarah Stanton is not Prayer Man.

If someone wishes to proclaim that PrayerPersonImage does not represent SarahDeanStanton, then maybe SarahDeanStantonImage can be identified on film. There are numerous statements and testimonies placing her on the landing. Her family has indicated it to be her, and provided a PhotographImage of her as well. What was the then size of the landing? Maybe 11' x 3.5' ? So, if another person of her indicated size is on the landing when filmed, she should be able to be located.
The PrayerPersonImage proper identification has been thoroughly researched, and debated. Evidence has been produced that strongly indicates SarahStanton to be the person represented by the Image, and disagreeing is not evidence. If I can be shown to have reached the wrong conclusion about PrayerPersonImage identity, so be it. But I have not seen any provable evidence indicating PrayerPersonImage represents anyone other than SarahDeanStanton!
The posters that wish to personally insult others, don't seem interested in providing reliable evidence.
In any event, if evidence, real evidence can be provided, bring it on.

[Larry Trotter]

At that point, Frazier moves both his hands in different directions. Just shows , you see what you want to see.

No Mr Mitcham, I see what I see, and that is what I described. I try to avoid simply running my mouth!

[Larry Trotter]

There's no speculation in my analysis of Frazier's comments when studied along with the existing imagery.

This is all Fact!!!!

In the recorded images where Calvery is seen, Frazier is looking to his right.
In a logical analysis, the turn to which Frazier refers can only be a turn to the left.
Frazier must have turned to his left to listen to Sarah Stanton.
This irrefutably means that Sarah Stanton is not Prayer Man.

I have to disagree Duncan. I see no indication of BuellWesleyFrazier turning to his left, and considering that he was watching and listening to GloriaCalvery's announcement as to what she had just seen as she arrived at the bottom of the stairs, for Mr Frazier to look towards someone beside him, even maybe slightly back, on his right, he would still likely turn somewhat in that direction, and in my opinion/conclusion, that person is SarahDeanStanton.

[Ray Mitcham]

No Mr Mitcham, I see what I see, and that is what I described. I try to avoid simply running my mouth!

"I try to avoid simply running my mouth!" And fail miserably, as usual.

[Larry Trotter]

You don't know, and neither does anyone else, that Gloria Calvery was making an announcement at the bottom of the stairs area.

As she can't be seen at the top of the steps in any images, and Buell is still facing to his right, it can logically be concluded, not assumed, that if Buell made another left turn towards Sarah Stanton, it must have been after Gloria Calvery had gone further up the steps and made her "announcement"

It's the only common sense scenario that fits a second left turn. 

And you do not know, and neither does anyone else, that GloriaCalvery did not make her alluded to announcement at the bottom of the stairs. There is evidentiary testimony that she announced what she had just witnessed after arriving at the stairs, which quite likely occurred less than 30 seconds after the shooting. And, their is visual evidence that BuellWesleyFrazierImage is looking at least slightly to his right as filmed, but I have seen no visual indication, nor seen/heard any testimony, that he actually turned to his left, and there is no visual evidence of SarahStantonImage being to his left in the seconds following the shooting. But, maybe he could be asked, and maybe he knew then, and maybe he remembers now.
In any event, I maintain my conclusion, based on evidentiary valuable indicative information. But for me, a waving motion of a hand without any specific directional information is not evidentiary valuable indicative information. And besides, if it did, is it known whether it is meant to be 'his left', or 'viewers left'?

I apologize for the incidental oversize lettering, as apparently another format change has occurred.

[Robin Unger]

From the Prayerman site.
Credit: Linda Giovanna Zambanini

Is this Pauline sanders ?

[Larry Trotter]

"I try to avoid simply running my mouth!" And fail miserably, as usual.

The  comments of a RunningMouthExpert? Oh well