Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Prayer Woman  (Read 1238118 times)

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #882 on: September 12, 2018, 01:07:12 AM »
Brehm, ignoring his young boy who was more or less in the line of fire and applauding the shooting.
Imagine trying to explain this to him after what he said.
Mere feet from the limo and notices nothing wrong until the head explodes, welcome to the real world.
Buell Frazier told us nothing and certainly nothing we could hang our coats on.
Viewing this event and putting emphasis on the eyewitnesses testimony to claim you know exactly what happened and when is about as convincing as you saying you "see hips" therefore there must be hips visable.
If I wanted Youtube level debate I'd go argue on there.

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #883 on: September 12, 2018, 06:23:23 PM »



Cankles and no visible hips.
Uhh, I do believe that the LadyImage pictured in the bottom photograph represents SarahJuanitaDean DanielStanton, and IMO, the photograph was taken in the early 1970s.

However, if the XLadyImage seen in the top photograph, represents SarahStanton, where is the evidence? And as well, in the middle photograph, where is the evidence indicative of the so labeled SarahStantonImage actually representing SarahStanton?
« Last Edit: September 12, 2018, 06:27:54 PM by Larry Trotter »

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #884 on: September 14, 2018, 07:52:38 PM »
Asking exactly how the images have "aided him" is all I'm doing but he has still yet to specify, that's completely dishonest behaviour as far as I'm concerned.

There is sufficient reliable provable evidence that places SarahDeanStanton on the TexasSchoolBookDepository Building Elm St entrance landing as the PresidentialMotorcade drove past at about 12:30pm CST 11/22/'63. She has to be there somewhere, so anyone wishing to deny the evidence indicating that PrayerPersonImage represents SarahDeanStanton needs to indicate where she is, and provide evidence indicative of her location, other than in the place of PrayerPersonImage.

It is quite disappointing that the well researched and well studied evidence indicative of PrayerPersonImage representing SarahDeanStanton is continually denied, but said denial fails to produce valid reliable provable evidence placing SarahDean Stanton anywhere else at said time, nor is there any valid reliable provable evidence produced indicative of anyone else being represented by PrayerPersonImage.


And what specifically is the mentioned "completely dishonest behaviour"? I will decide my behavior, and let others determine their own behaviour!

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #885 on: September 16, 2018, 06:16:03 PM »
I suppose that my problem is that the small FemalePersonImage, as seen on some versions of DarnellFilm, is just that, (as seen on some versions).
Based on what I have seen and experienced in this situation, I am unable to place any reliability on the use and placement of mannequins.
As I recall, I too held reservations regarding any purposeful exposure of any contacted relatives of SarahStanton to any forum discussion(s) about the assassination of USP JohnKennedySr.
« Last Edit: September 25, 2018, 02:11:40 AM by Larry Trotter »

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #886 on: October 09, 2018, 10:49:26 PM »

I'm not at all sure Frazier is as far forward on the landing as Andrej puts him!


To be viewed if needed, but insertions are insertions, IMO. And, it appears as though a BillyLoveladyImageMannequin is still on the stairs and facing GloriaCalveryImageMannequin, when there is evidence indicating another LadyImage to be in that space, in front of GCI.
In any event, I do not recognize any evidentiary value on the VirtualEntrancePortal with PersonImageMannequin insertions.
« Last Edit: October 09, 2018, 11:09:01 PM by Larry Trotter »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #887 on: October 18, 2018, 06:51:33 PM »
 BS:

Nobody has proven who prayer person is.

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #888 on: October 19, 2018, 05:29:26 PM »
BS:
Nobody has proven who prayer person is.

Granted John, "proven" is a strong word for a powerful state of being. And, I prefer to use evidence, but with value added terms, like indicative, reliable, provable, accessible, as a judgement for reasoning of a stated conclusion.
That said, I have concluded, for some time now, that accessible, reliable, and provable evidence is indicative of PrayerPersonImage representing SarahJuanitaDean/Daniel/Stanton. Her own statement/testimony places her on the TexasSchoolBookDepository Building Elm St EntranceLanding at the time, as does testimony/statements of other LandingOccupants who, like her, were then employed at the TSBD Bldg. So, she has to be there somewhere, and it is a small area. Plainly stated, in order to remove SarahDeanStanton from the PrayerPersonImage space, she would have to be relocated to another space on the Landing.
« Last Edit: October 21, 2018, 05:24:26 PM by Larry Trotter »