Buell Wesley Frazier

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Buell Wesley Frazier  (Read 517575 times)

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5120
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #875 on: April 08, 2025, 05:26:11 AM »
It's on record and he hasn't caved in, yet. His two independent ways of estimating it make sense, in fact, it actually matched a pair of curtain rods in the Paine's garage. I know it frustrates the heck out of you—LOL.

The curtain rods in the Paine garage were 27.5 inches or 698.5 mm and I'm 6'2" or 1870 mm and there is no way I can carry something that long in the way Frazier described. So unless Oswald had gorilla type arms which he didn't, there was no way Oswald would be able to carry 27.5 inch curtain rods between his armpit and his cupped hand!
Try it yourself!





JohnM

Offline Tom Sorensen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #876 on: April 08, 2025, 05:41:30 AM »
Right, I should remove that reference from my post.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #877 on: April 08, 2025, 05:45:03 AM »
The curtain rods in the Paine garage were 27.5 inches or 698.5 mm and I'm 6'2" or 1870 mm and there is no way I can carry something that long in the way Frazier described. So unless Oswald had gorilla type arms which he didn't, there was no way Oswald would be able to carry 27.5 inch curtain rods between his armpit and his cupped hand!
Try it yourself!





JohnM

I agree. So it wasn't curtain rods. I believe the curtain rods story was just the excuse Oswald used instead of having to tell a 19 years old Buell Frazier about his martial problems.

So, the bag, which didn't contain curtain rods would have to have been smaller (actually about 10 cm) to fit between Oswald's armpit and the cup of his hand.

Which, of course, also rules out a broken down MC rifle being in that bag.


I'm 6'2" or 1870 mm

Really? You are 1,87 meters?

I'm 6'3" and I am only 1,83 meters....

How can you be smaller than me in feet/inches and bigger in meters?

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5120
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #878 on: April 08, 2025, 06:24:08 AM »

I'm 6'2" or 1870 mm

Really? You are 1,87 meters?

I'm 6'3" and I am only 1,83 meters....

How can you be smaller than me in feet/inches and bigger in meters?

 ???

6'3" = 75 inches = 190.5 cm



JohnM

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5120
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #879 on: April 08, 2025, 06:36:37 AM »
I agree. So it wasn't curtain rods. I believe the curtain rods story was just the excuse Oswald used instead of having to tell a 19 years old Buell Frazier about his martial problems.

So, the bag, which didn't contain curtain rods would have to have been smaller (actually about 10 cm) to fit between Oswald's armpit and the cup of his hand.

Which, of course, also rules out a broken down MC rifle being in that bag.

So, it wasn't curtain rods and it wasn't a rifle and Oswald said it was his lunch but that's a mighty long lunch and why on earth would he stick one end into his armpit? Ewww!



JohnM

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #880 on: April 08, 2025, 06:38:43 AM »
???

6'3" = 75 inches = 190.5 cm



JohnM

Hilarious...

I was measured in England in feet when I got my driving license there and I was measured in Spain when I changed my license to a Spanish one.

Those are factual measurements....

When you use "mm" (which is millimeters) it's pretty obvious that you haven't got a clue about the metric system.

Perhaps you should rely less on the BS that's available on the internet. 

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #881 on: April 08, 2025, 06:40:26 AM »
So, it wasn't curtain rods and it wasn't a rifle and Oswald said it was his lunch but that's a mighty long lunch and why on earth would he stick one end into his armpit? Ewww!



JohnM

Show me where exactly Oswald said it was his lunch?