Buell Wesley Frazier

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Buell Wesley Frazier  (Read 517615 times)

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1327
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #868 on: April 07, 2025, 03:23:06 PM »
Yes I can. And I do.

There is no left hand.

The Commission found that Randle saw Oswald carrying the bag with only his right hand.
Here are 2 more quotes from the WCR that make that clear:

There was no other hand used or written into the WC findings. You're just making that up.

What she said is not going away because you want to dismiss and ignore it.

This is a post from you quoting Linnie May.

“and he carried it in his right hand, had the top sort of folded down and had a grip like this, and the bottom, he carried it this way, you know, and it almost touched the ground as he carried it”


And the bottom, he carried it this way". The words “AND the bottom” completely defines the statement.

Powerful words, aren’t they? A direct reference to the other hand. One hand cannot hold top and bottom.

You obviously understand their importance or why would you pretend they do not exist and pretend quoting a WC summary is somehow better.?

The same as referring to “gripping the top with his right hand and it tappered ---”hugged” it in his hand. It is the same reference in both quotes.

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 778
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #869 on: April 07, 2025, 03:38:31 PM »
What she said is not going away because you want to dismiss and ignore it.

This is a post from you quoting Linnie May.

“and he carried it in his right hand, had the top sort of folded down and had a grip like this, and the bottom, he carried it this way, you know, and it almost touched the ground as he carried it”


And the bottom, he carried it this way". The words “AND the bottom” completely defines the statement.

Powerful words, aren’t they? A direct reference to the other hand. One hand cannot hold top and bottom.

You obviously understand their importance or why would you pretend they do not exist and pretend quoting a WC summary is somehow better.?

The same as referring to “gripping the top with his right hand and it tappered ---”hugged” it in his hand. It is the same reference in both quotes.

I have no need to respond to made up  BS:

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1327
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #870 on: April 07, 2025, 03:57:12 PM »
I have no need to respond to made up  BS:

You have repeatedly proven you cannot respond to it. It is impossible to deny.

 Here it is again for you. :"AND the bottom he carried it this way."

Pretend all you want but it does not change what Linnie May stated in her WC testimony.

A bag 27 inches long does not work with LHO walking normally. That is the reality of it.

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 778
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #871 on: April 07, 2025, 04:03:41 PM »
What she said is not going away because you want to dismiss and ignore it.

 Thumb1: Sure it will. You're the only one that says it.

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1327
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #872 on: April 07, 2025, 04:37:54 PM »
Thumb1: Sure it will. You're the only one that says it.


No, it won't.

You obviously understand it.  Her statement cannot be explained away, or you would have.

Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #873 on: April 07, 2025, 11:44:14 PM »
I have "blind faith"

Common among MAGA xxxxxxx.

when the person who was present at the event with no apparent reason to lie about an innocuous event

Apparent.

(i.e. he asked Oswald whether he carried his lunch that day and Oswald said no) confirms this happened.

Classic Richard Smith misuse of "confirmed". There is no other account of what took place inside that car.

How exactly could this be proven to your subjective satisfaction absent a time machine? 

It couldn't, even objectively, and you're still struggling to understand this. Wow!

The real knee slapper is that you are relying on this same witness


False, I'm not relying on Frazier.

- who you appear to be suggesting lied about asking if Oswald had his lunch -

False, it may appear so to you for whatever reason.

for his estimate of the length of a bag that he hardly saw. 

I haven't referred to his estimate—DOH.

Riddle me this Batman, if Frazier was willing to lie about Oswald not carrying his lunch - again as you suggest he did -


Again, I haven't suggested that.

then why wouldn't he also confirm the more important fact that the bag was long enough to carry the rifle?

Because the curtain rods would fit the shorter bag, cupped in Oswald's hand, as claimed by Frazier.

HA HA HA. 


Certainly, you failed again.

I know logic and common sense are not among your strong points but this is actually embarrassing.


Knowing how MAGA logic works, I wouldn't be too concerned about your opinion.

Do you accept Frazier's estimate of the length of the bag or not?

Offline Tom Sorensen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #874 on: April 08, 2025, 05:10:20 AM »
Do you accept Frazier's estimate of the length of the bag or not?

It's on record and he hasn't caved in, yet. His two independent ways of estimating it make sense. I know it frustrates the heck out of you—LOL.
« Last Edit: April 08, 2025, 05:42:22 AM by Tom Sorensen »