What part of this issue would you like to kick off with?
Go---Start Debating, use reply 2025 to start.
Good summary by Zeon.
Zeon Mason:
Reply 2025
Ok, thanks for posting that WC testimony of Rowland wife. It’s only the part of him telling her about sighting a man with gun at the SE window that she confirms. The black elderly male in the SW window is an after the fact detail which maybe an “embellishment”.
Therefore there’s more wiggle room here that BRW was never in the SN but that he was where he said he was siting on the cart a couple windows down from the box wall. Why chicken bones were found on top the boxes IDK but it’s not that relevant anymore as now there is time from 11:45 till 11:49 that the TSBD shooter had time to stack boxes and adjust the window.
Can we reasonably also discard Rowlands sighting of a man with rifle in hand at the SW window before the fact? If so then there is no problem with Oswald being sighted at by Carolyn Arnold from 12:15-12:17 as he had already prepared the SN from 11:45 till about 12:00 when he went down to the 1st floor and seen by Eddie Piper then.
1] We'll start the debate when you have made your position clear. FOR THE SIXTH TIME - do you believe Rowland invented the man with the rifle on the 6th floor?
I literally have no idea why you won't answer this Yes/No question.
It's really baffling.
Just answer the question.
2] I have no idea why you want to start the debate with Zeon's speculation. I don't understand the point you want to debate. What is the specific point you want to open up with?
These are two unbelievably simple things to clarify. It couldn't be any simpler.
Yet I have a serious doubt you will be able to accomplish either.
I can't start the debate if I don't understand the point you want to debate.