Author Topic: The Miracle On Elm Street  (Read 8516 times)

Viewing This Topic: Steve Howsley

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1461
Re: The Miracle On Elm Street
« Reply #21 on: Yesterday at 06:24:08 PM »
Firstly, Jack...YOU are the Nutter who inspired this thread.
You were posting your idiocy on another one of my threads that was off-topic, so I created this thread to move the subject here where anyone who believed in the Miracle On Elm Street could come and justify their silliness.

And I'm so glad you are ready to debate.
Let's go.
Firstly, just confirm that you believe Rowland invented seeing the man with the scoped, high-powered rifle on the 6th floor of the TSBD building. I know it's the fourth time I've asked you to answer this most simple yes/no question but you seem to lack the courage to just come out and state it plainly (and I don't really blame you).

And I'm so glad you are up for a debate.
You can kick this debate off with any piece of evidence or argument you would like.
Ask any question and I will endeavour to answer it as fully as I can.
But don't forget to answer the yes/no question.

What was the post? What was the thread? Why are you so vague about this?

Online Jarrett Smith

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 269
Re: The Miracle On Elm Street
« Reply #22 on: Yesterday at 10:33:30 PM »
Do you believe Arnold Rowland saw the man with the rifle at the west end of the 6th floor?

What about the person looking out the window after the shooting on the Dillard photo?


Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4098
Re: The Miracle On Elm Street
« Reply #23 on: Today at 11:23:00 AM »
What was the post? What was the thread? Why are you so vague about this?

"The First Shot" thread.
Reply #2017 (with follow up posts - Reply #2021, #2025)

Is that precise enough for you?
Now, FOR THE FIFTH TIME - do you believe Rowland invented seeing the man on the 6th floor? Yes or No.

Are you now ready for a debate?
What part of this issue would you like to kick off with?
Stop wasting time and let's go!

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1461
Re: The Miracle On Elm Street
« Reply #24 on: Today at 03:31:46 PM »
"The First Shot" thread.
Reply #2017 (with follow up posts - Reply #2021, #2025)

Is that precise enough for you?
Now, FOR THE FIFTH TIME - do you believe Rowland invented seeing the man on the 6th floor? Yes or No.

Are you now ready for a debate?
What part of this issue would you like to kick off with?
Stop wasting time and let's go!

What part of this issue would you like to kick off with?

 Go---Start Debating, use reply 2025 to start.

Good summary by Zeon.

Zeon Mason:

Reply 2025

Ok, thanks for posting that WC testimony of Rowland wife. It’s only the part of him telling her about sighting a man with gun at the SE window that she confirms. The black elderly male in the SW window is an after the fact detail which maybe an “embellishment”.

Therefore there’s more wiggle room here that BRW was never in the SN but that he was where he said he was siting on the cart a couple windows down from the box wall. Why chicken bones were found on top the boxes IDK but it’s not that relevant anymore as now there is time from 11:45 till 11:49 that the TSBD shooter had time to stack boxes and adjust the window.

Can we reasonably also discard Rowlands sighting of a man with rifle in hand at the SW window before the fact? If so then there is no problem with Oswald being sighted at by Carolyn Arnold from 12:15-12:17 as he had already prepared the SN from 11:45 till about 12:00 when he went down to the 1st floor and seen by Eddie Piper then.

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4098
Re: The Miracle On Elm Street
« Reply #25 on: Today at 04:28:27 PM »
What part of this issue would you like to kick off with?

 Go---Start Debating, use reply 2025 to start.

Good summary by Zeon.

Zeon Mason:

Reply 2025

Ok, thanks for posting that WC testimony of Rowland wife. It’s only the part of him telling her about sighting a man with gun at the SE window that she confirms. The black elderly male in the SW window is an after the fact detail which maybe an “embellishment”.

Therefore there’s more wiggle room here that BRW was never in the SN but that he was where he said he was siting on the cart a couple windows down from the box wall. Why chicken bones were found on top the boxes IDK but it’s not that relevant anymore as now there is time from 11:45 till 11:49 that the TSBD shooter had time to stack boxes and adjust the window.

Can we reasonably also discard Rowlands sighting of a man with rifle in hand at the SW window before the fact? If so then there is no problem with Oswald being sighted at by Carolyn Arnold from 12:15-12:17 as he had already prepared the SN from 11:45 till about 12:00 when he went down to the 1st floor and seen by Eddie Piper then.

1] We'll start the debate when you have made your position clear. FOR THE SIXTH TIME - do you believe Rowland invented the man with the rifle on the 6th floor?
I literally have no idea why you won't answer this Yes/No question.
It's really baffling.
Just answer the question.

2] I have no idea why you want to start the debate with Zeon's speculation. I don't understand the point you want to debate. What is the specific point you want to open up with?

These are two unbelievably simple things to clarify. It couldn't be any simpler.
Yet I have a serious doubt you will be able to accomplish either.
I can't start the debate if I don't understand the point you want to debate.
« Last Edit: Today at 04:35:30 PM by Dan O'meara »