Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?  (Read 11314 times)

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2512
Re: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #70 on: August 14, 2026, 06:08:21 PM »
like so many of your fellow CTs

First of all, I have no fellow CTs, as I don't have a conspiracy theory

Which means your sole purpose here is to be a pein in the Bahookie. IOW, you are troll.
Quote

you know so many things that aren't true.

BS... You don't know what I know or not know. But I'll play your silly game; name one thing that I know isn't true!

Perhaps I misjudged you. Are you saying you are a know nothing? That I would believe.
Quote

No, it's because they believe so many myths that I don't.

Name one of those myths!

Just one?

How about the SBT is impossible?

Want more?

JFK and JBC reacted to being shot at different times.
JFK was shot from the front.
Oswald couldn't have fired 3 shots in the amount of time he had.
There was a shooter on the GK.
Oswald couldn't have reached the lunchroom before Baker.

There's a lot more where those came from.
« Last Edit: August 14, 2026, 06:11:52 PM by John Corbett »

Online Brian Doyle

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 303
Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #71 on: August 14, 2026, 06:54:12 PM »


Jeremy Bojczuk - Education Forum 2019:


" Jarman's remarks were in an interview, unpublished as far as I can tell, given on 25 September 1977 to William Brown and Albert Maxwell. There is a transcript online at https://www.thenewdisease.space/james-jarman-hsca . This is the relevant portion:

  Quote
 

And, after we was inside the building after that, I heard that Oswald had came [sic] down through the office and came down the front stairs and he was stopped by the officer that had stopped us and sent us back in the building and Mr. Truddy [sic] told them that that was alright, that he worked here, so then, he proceeded own [sic] out the building and we wondered why he stopped us.

...

Well, there was a billy love lady [sic] standing out there, he was on the steps, see.

...

And, Oswald was coming out the door and he [Lovelady] said the police had stopped Oswald and sent him back in the building, billy love lady [sic] said that Mr. Trudy [sic] told the policeman that Oswald was alright, that he worked there, so Oswald walked on down the stairs.

 

It looks as though Oswald's encounter with a policeman by the front doors took place some time after Marrion Baker's encounter on the third or fourth floor with someone who did not match Oswald's description. As Vanessa points out, the fact that Jarman was quoting Lovelady, who was certainly on the steps during the shooting, adds credence to his account. "

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2512
Re: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #72 on: August 14, 2026, 06:57:57 PM »

Jeremy Bojczuk - Education Forum 2019:


" Jarman's remarks were in an interview, unpublished as far as I can tell, given on 25 September 1977 to William Brown and Albert Maxwell. There is a transcript online at https://www.thenewdisease.space/james-jarman-hsca . This is the relevant portion:

  Quote
 

And, after we was inside the building after that, I heard that Oswald had came [sic] down through the office and came down the front stairs and he was stopped by the officer that had stopped us and sent us back in the building and Mr. Truddy [sic] told them that that was alright, that he worked here, so then, he proceeded own [sic] out the building and we wondered why he stopped us.

...

Well, there was a billy love lady [sic] standing out there, he was on the steps, see.

...

And, Oswald was coming out the door and he [Lovelady] said the police had stopped Oswald and sent him back in the building, billy love lady [sic] said that Mr. Trudy [sic] told the policeman that Oswald was alright, that he worked there, so Oswald walked on down the stairs.

 

It looks as though Oswald's encounter with a policeman by the front doors took place some time after Marrion Baker's encounter on the third or fourth floor with someone who did not match Oswald's description. As Vanessa points out, the fact that Jarman was quoting Lovelady, who was certainly on the steps during the shooting, adds credence to his account. "

Delusional as usual.

Online Brian Doyle

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 303
Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #73 on: August 14, 2026, 07:27:41 PM »
Delusional as usual.

You called for the references...Were given them...And then name-called instead of answering what they showed...

Lovelady committed perjury, by your own evidence, when he said he did not see Oswald after the elevator and then told Jarman he saw Oswald leave through the front door...HSCA showed no interest in Lovelady changing his story and basically admitting he with-held evidence...They showed no interest because they knew it was a powder keg they didn't want to touch...

What you are avoiding answering here, Mr Corbett, is that Lovelady saw Harvey try to leave through the front door and getting stopped by the un-named cop at the front door, and being forced to come back inside to the Lobby...This makes sense because the Martin Film shows Lovelady has separated from Shelley at this point and was on the outside steps...

We know Lovelady was lying and covering for CIA Shelley because Mr Truly was not back down to the Lobby from the upper floors when this occurred...It was actually Shelley who intervened as Oswald's "Superintendent" and OK-ed him, but "Oswald" was then told to step aside and wait by the un-named cop...Shelley then assisted "Oswald" out the rear Loading Dock exit...Lovelady's whole purpose in telling this lie to Jarman is to cover-up Shelley OK-ing Oswald in the Lobby and replace him with Truly...

Jarman then proceeds to do exactly what Holmes did and conflates the "OK-ed by Truly and walked on down the stairs", that happened in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room, with walking out the front door and down the front stairs...This mixing and muddling of the two stops by cops is being done intentionally so they can be conflated in to one stop by a cop during the Lunch Room Encounter in order to lose this dangerous stopping of Oswald by a cop in the Lobby and Shelley's bailing him out...

If you read Bojczuk's final summation at the bottom of the quote he realizes this was a second stop by a second cop in the Lobby...

The Education Forum is trying its hardest to keep this explosive break-through from the board...

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8392
Re: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #74 on: August 14, 2026, 07:51:48 PM »
Which means your sole purpose here is to be a pein in the Bahookie. IOW, you are troll.
Perhaps I misjudged you. Are you saying you are a know nothing? That I would believe.
Just one?

How about the SBT is impossible?

Want more?

JFK and JBC reacted to being shot at different times.
JFK was shot from the front.
Oswald couldn't have fired 3 shots in the amount of time he had.
There was a shooter on the GK.
Oswald couldn't have reached the lunchroom before Baker.

There's a lot more where those came from.

Which means your sole purpose here is to be a pein in the Bahookie. IOW, you are troll.

Why do you constantly insist to show off your complete ignorance?

I'm only a pain in your back because I am asking questions you can't or don't want to answer.

Perhaps I misjudged you. Are you saying you are a know nothing? That I would believe.

I'm not sure how your clearly confused mind came op with this "conclusion", but you are indeed right about one thing. You are indeed misjudging me, but that's a given for someone as clueless as you.

Btw thanks for showing everybody that once again you have made another bogus claim. Your inability to name one thing that I - according to you - know isn't true, speaks volumes!

How about the SBT is impossible?
JFK and JBC reacted to being shot at different times.
JFK was shot from the front.
Oswald couldn't have fired 3 shots in the amount of time he had.
There was a shooter on the GK.

I have never expressed an opinion about any of these. Unlike you, I don't jump to conclusions about things I can not verify.

Oswald couldn't have reached the lunchroom before Baker.

This one is just plain silly, because Oswald was in the lunchroom when Baker came in, right?

A far better question would be; what was he doing there?

If - as you claim but can't prove - Oswald was on the run why didn't he simply turn right and go through hall way and office directly to the frontdoor of the building?

There's a lot more where those came from.

I'm sure there are. Your imagination seems to have no limits and what you come up with shows clearly how delusional you are.

Online Brian Doyle

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 303
Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #75 on: August 14, 2026, 09:26:33 PM »


Jarman said:


"And, after we was inside the building after that, I heard that Oswald had came [sic] down through the office and came down the front stairs and he was stopped by the officer that had stopped us and sent us back in the building and Mr. Truddy [sic] told them that that was alright, that he worked here, so then, he proceeded own [sic] out the building and we wondered why he stopped us."


Corbett is having visible trouble answering...

When Jarman details that Oswald had "came down through the office" and "was stopped by the officer that has stopped us" he gives information that is backed by Mrs Reid witnessing Oswald walking through the 2nd Floor Offices before going down the SE staircase...

Corbett has a real dilemma here because the only place the cop who stopped Jarman and the other negro employees could be is in the Lobby by the front door because Truly & Baker never stopped those workers on the 2nd Floor...

The wording also connotes that after Oswald was stopped by that officer that Oswald then walked out the front door and down the front steps and out of the building...There's no doubt that is what Jarman means and he even adds that it made him wonder why the cop stopped him if he had allowed Oswald to leave...The context is clearly referencing being told all this by Lovelady...

So you have a problem here because Jarman makes clear all this happened with a un-named cop at the front door...A cop that had stopped him and his black co-workers...And a cop that then also stopped Oswald but then (allegedly) let him leave...

Not only did the FBI and Warren Commission do zero investigation in to this but the HSCA also unaccountably showed no interest in Lovelady with-holding evidence and committing perjury...

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2512
Re: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #76 on: August 14, 2026, 10:39:19 PM »
Which means your sole purpose here is to be a pein in the Bahookie. IOW, you are troll.

Why do you constantly insist to show off your complete ignorance?

I'm only a pain in your back because I am asking questions you can't or don't want to answer.

There is no question you have asked me that I haven't been ask and answered numerous times over the last 35 years. You recycle the same old I could crush a Grape ooooh yummy yummy that have floating around the CT punch bowl for decades.
Quote

Perhaps I misjudged you. Are you saying you are a know nothing? That I would believe.

I'm not sure how your clearly confused mind came op with this "conclusion", but you are indeed right about one thing. You are indeed misjudging me, but that's a given for someone as clueless as you.

This from a guy who admits he's too dumb too have an opinion on the issues of the JFKA.
Quote

Btw thanks for showing everybody that once again you have made another bogus claim. Your inability to name one thing that I - according to you - know isn't true, speaks volumes!

How can I name one thing when you lack the guts to tell anybody what you believe.
Quote

How about the SBT is impossible?
JFK and JBC reacted to being shot at different times.
JFK was shot from the front.
Oswald couldn't have fired 3 shots in the amount of time he had.
There was a shooter on the GK.

I have never expressed an opinion about any of these. Unlike you, I don't jump to conclusions about things I can not verify.

Jump to conclusions? It's been over six decades. Just how long does it take you to figure out such simple concepts. This isn't rocket science. The truth is you're just too Helicopter :) to take a position on any of these matters.
Quote

Oswald couldn't have reached the lunchroom before Baker.

This one is just plain silly, because Oswald was in the lunchroom when Baker came in, right?

Now you're just playing your Helicopter :) games with semantics. You know damn well the argument has been that Oswald couldn't have reached the second floor lunchroom before Baker if he had fired the shots from 6th floor. This is just the kind of childish games internet trolls play to get their jollies. Just how pathetic is your life that this is what you do for fun?
Quote

A far better question would be; what was he doing there?

If its' such a good question, what is your answer. Do you have the guts to answer it?
Quote

If - as you claim but can't prove - Oswald was on the run why didn't he simply turn right and go through hall way and office directly to the frontdoor of the building?

Now you expect me to read Oswald's mind. The fact is he went into the lunchroom seconds before Baker reached the landing. It's not like he had a lot of time to ponder his next move before Baker confronted him.
Quote

There's a lot more where those came from.

I'm sure there are. Your imagination seems to have no limits and what you come up with shows clearly how delusional you are.

Neither does your cowardice.
« Last Edit: August 14, 2026, 10:52:06 PM by John Corbett »