Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?

[Martin Weidmann]

There is no question you have asked me that I haven't been ask and answered numerous times over the last 35 years. You recycle the same old I could crush a Grape ooooh yummy yummy that have floating around the CT punch bowl for decades.
This from a guy who admits he's too dumb too have an opinion on the issues of the JFKA.
How can I name one thing when you lack the guts to tell anybody what you believe.
Jump to conclusions? It's been over six decades. Just how long does it take you to figure out such simple concepts. This isn't rocket science. The truth is you're just too Helicopter to take a position on any of these matters.
Now you're just your Helicopter playing games with semantics. You know damn well the argument has been that Oswald couldn't have reached the second floor lunchroom before Baker if he had fired the shots from 6th floor. This is just the kind of childish games internet trolls play to get their jollies. Just how pathetic is your life that this is what you do for fun?
If its' such a good question, what is your answer. Do you have the guts to answer it?
Now you expect me to read Oswald's mind. The fact is he went into the lunchroom seconds before Baker reached the landing. It's not like he had a lot of time to ponder his next move before Baker confronted him.
Neither does your cowardice.

There is no question you have asked me that I haven't been ask and answered numerous times over the last 35 years. You recycle the same old I could crush a Grape ooooh yummy yummy that have floating around the CT punch bowl for decades.

Evasive! If you have answered a question before, you should be able to simply provide that answer. So, why don't you?

This from a guy who admits he's too dumb too have an opinion on the issues of the JFKA.

With idiots like you around, not having an opinion (which equals an open mind) is probably the best option 

How can I name one thing when you lack the guts to tell anybody what you believe.

Oh boy.... You claimed that I know so many things that aren't true.

Your problem, like so many of your fellow CTs, is that you know so many things that aren't true.

So, now you admit that you don't even know what I know or not. Keep digging the hole......

Jump to conclusions? It's been over six decades. Just how long does it take you to figure out such simple concepts. This isn't rocket science. The truth is you're just too Helicopter to take a position on any of these matters.

The time lapse doesn't matter. You are constantly jumping to the same conclusions as the WC did in 1964.

Now you're just your Helicopter playing games with semantics. You know damn well the argument has been that Oswald couldn't have reached the second floor lunchroom before Baker if he had fired the shots from 6th floor. This is just the kind of childish games internet trolls play to get their jollies. Just how pathetic is your life that this is what you do for fun?

No semantics. I just replied to one of your more idiotic comments. Why don't you show me the evidence that proves that Oswald did in fact come down the stairs from the 6th floor. Can you do that?
I seriously doubt it.

If its' such a good question, what is your answer. Do you have the guts to answer it?

He may well have been getting a soda, as he claimed. How's that for an answer?

Now you expect me to read Oswald's mind.

Huh? You've been doing exactly that time after time, so why not now?

The fact is he went into the lunchroom seconds before Baker reached the landing. It's not like he had a lot of time to ponder his next move before Baker confronted him.

Aha, so now it's a fact? Really?... I have actually been in the building and saw the lay out of the 2nd floor. If I had been on the run, there is now way that I would go into a lunchroom and corner myself in, when all I had to do is turn right and walk out of the building.

Neither does your cowardice.

Getting frustrated?   

You can try to save face by attacking me, but if you want to be taken seriously, you really need to start talking about the case and answer questions. As long as you don't, you'll be never considered to be anything but a loser.

[John Corbett]

There is no question you have asked me that I haven't been ask and answered numerous times over the last 35 years. You recycle the same old I could crush a Grape ooooh yummy yummy that have floating around the CT punch bowl for decades.

Evasive! If you have answered a question before, you should be able to simply provide that answer. So, why don't you?

You aren't a Cowardly Lion. You are a Lyin' Coward. Nobody has to guess what I believe. I have stated my position on the JFKA time and again. I have stated unambiguously that Oswald fired the shots that killed JFK and that there is zero evidence that he had even a single accomplice. I have stated that he missed with his first shot, hit both JFK and JBC with the second, and blew JFK's brains out with his third. I have stated with specificity when I believe each of these three shots were fired. You on the other hand have NEVER stated what you believe on these fundamental questions. Why don't you grow a pair I tell us what you believe before you go around of accusing others of not answering questions.

This from a guy who admits he's too dumb too have an opinion on the issues of the JFKA.

With idiots like you around, not having an opinion (which equals an open mind) is probably the best option 

Is that your excuse for being a Helicopter

How can I name one thing when you lack the guts to tell anybody what you believe.

Oh boy.... You claimed that I know so many things that aren't true.

You continue to put your cowardice on full display. I have differences with the CTs on this forum but at least they have the guts to take a position and argue for it. You have never done that. You're too Helicopter

So, now you admit that you don't even know what I know or not. Keep digging the hole......

How could anybody know what you think when you don't have the guts to tell us.

Jump to conclusions? It's been over six decades. Just how long does it take you to figure out such simple concepts. This isn't rocket science. The truth is you're just too Helicopter to take a position on any of these matters.

The time lapse doesn't matter. You are constantly jumping to the same conclusions as the WC did in 1964.

Keep running, coward.

Now you're just your Helicopter playing games with semantics. You know damn well the argument has been that Oswald couldn't have reached the second floor lunchroom before Baker if he had fired the shots from 6th floor. This is just the kind of childish games internet trolls play to get their jollies. Just how pathetic is your life that this is what you do for fun?

No semantics. I just replied to one of your more idiotic comments. Why don't you show me the evidence that proves that Oswald did in fact come down the stairs from the 6th floor. Can you do that?

There is ample forensic evidence which establishes Oswald fired the shots and he was seen a short time later entering the lunchroom. The stairs is the most likely way for him to come down. If you want to argue he took the elevator instead, it's up to you to make that case. We both know you lack the guts to take that or any other position.

I seriously doubt it.

If its' such a good question, what is your answer. Do you have the guts to answer it?

He may well have been getting a soda, as he claimed. How's that for an answer?

I guess killing a president works up quite a thirst.

Now you expect me to read Oswald's mind.

Huh? You've been doing exactly that time after time, so why not now?

Everyone knows that I have consistently taken the position that we have no way of knowing what Oswald was thinking at any given time and we are left to guess. If you want, I could easily cite a dozen examples of that and I would be more than happy to jam them up your nose.

The fact is he went into the lunchroom seconds before Baker reached the landing. It's not like he had a lot of time to ponder his next move before Baker confronted him.

Aha, so now it's a fact? Really?... I have actually been in the building and saw the lay out of the 2nd floor. If I had been on the run, there is now way that I would go into a lunchroom and corner myself in, when all I had to do is turn right and walk out of the building.

What you would have done is irrelevant. Oswald got to make those decisions.

Neither does your cowardice.

Getting frustrated?   

You can try to save face by attacking me, but if you want to be taken seriously, you really need to start talking about the case and answer questions. As long as you don't, you'll be never considered to be anything but a loser.

Not frustrated. Just disgusted by a man whose life must be so pathetic that the only jollies he gets is trolling internet discussion groups for the sole purpose of playing childish word games without ever having the courage to actually take a position and defend it.

[Martin Weidmann]

You aren't a Cowardly Lion. You are a Lyin' Coward. Nobody has to guess what I believe. I have stated my position on the JFKA time and again. I have stated unambiguously that Oswald fired the shots that killed JFK and that there is zero evidence that he had even a single accomplice. I have stated that he missed with his first shot, hit both JFK and JBC with the second, and blew JFK's brains out with his third. I have stated with specificity when I believe each of these three shots were fired. You on the other hand have NEVER stated what you believe on these fundamental questions. Why don't you grow a pair I tell us what you believe before you go around of accusing others of not answering questions.
Is that your excuse for being a Helicopter
You continue to put your cowardice on full display. I have differences with the CTs on this forum but at least they have the guts to take a position and argue for it. You have never done that. You're too Helicopter
How could anybody know what you think when you don't have the guts to tell us.
Keep running, coward.
I guess killing a president works up quite a thirst.
Everyone knows that I have consistently taken the position that we have no way of knowing what Oswald was thinking at any given time and we are left to guess. If you want, I could easily cite a dozen examples of that and I would be more than happy to jam them up your nose.
What you would have done is irrelevant. Oswald got to make those decisions.
Not frustrated. Just disgusted by a man whose life must be so pathetic that the only jollies he gets is trolling internet discussion groups for the sole purpose of playing childish word games without ever having the courage to actually take a position and defend it.

Wow, the pathetic little man is resorting to insults to cover up the fact that he has nothing of any value to add to any discussion.

is trolling internet discussion groups

What groups would that be? Or is this just one more thing you are making up?

[Jake Maxwell]

Wow, the pathetic little man is resorting to insults to cover up the fact that he has nothing of any value to add to any discussion.

is trolling internet discussion groups

What groups would that be? Or is this just one more thing you are making up?

Maybe an earlier post gives some explanation:

Unfortunately, there are still CIA officials who apparently don't want all the JFKA files released... It is very possible there are agents out there - active or retired - tasked to keep the issues confused with a flood of "this or that," and "he said, she said," along with a boatload of ad hominems to keep the matter from being rationally discussed and settled...

[Michael Capasse]

You aren't a Cowardly Lion. You are a Lyin' Coward. Nobody has to guess what I believe. I have stated my position on the JFKA time and again. I have stated unambiguously that Oswald fired the shots that killed JFK and that there is zero evidence that he had even a single accomplice. I have stated that he missed with his first shot, hit both JFK and JBC with the second, and blew JFK's brains out with his third. I have stated with specificity when I believe each of these three shots were fired. You on the other hand have NEVER stated what you believe on these fundamental questions. Why don't you grow a pair I tell us what you believe before you go around of accusing others of not answering questions.
Is that your excuse for being a Helicopter
You continue to put your cowardice on full display. I have differences with the CTs on this forum but at least they have the guts to take a position and argue for it. You have never done that. You're too Helicopter
How could anybody know what you think when you don't have the guts to tell us.
Keep running, coward.
I guess killing a president works up quite a thirst.
Everyone knows that I have consistently taken the position that we have no way of knowing what Oswald was thinking at any given time and we are left to guess. If you want, I could easily cite a dozen examples of that and I would be more than happy to jam them up your nose.
What you would have done is irrelevant. Oswald got to make those decisions.
Not frustrated. Just disgusted by a man whose life must be so pathetic that the only jollies he gets is trolling internet discussion groups for the sole purpose of playing childish word games without ever having the courage to actually take a position and defend it.

You are a fake.

[John Corbett]

You are a fake.

You must be a Wiedman sock puppet.

[Tom Graves]

You must be a Wiedman sock puppet.

He's dead right about Trump, but dead wrong about the JFKA.

You, on the other hand, are dead right about the JFKA (except for the exact timing of LHO's early, missing-everything, shot), and dead wrong about Trump.

Me?

I'm dead right about both.