Mary Woodward said there were 3 shots and the 1st shot missed everything

[Tom Graves]

Jackie Kennedy stated that she was looking at the crowd to her left right until the point where Kennedy was struck in the throat. Look at the frames prior to that and she is looking to her right the whole time. Why would she lie? Did she lie or was she confused?

Jackie was already looking to her left at Z-143 when she started turning her head a bit farther and was photographically "captured" with a concerned look on her face in Robert Croft's Z-161 photo.

Around Z-175 she started turning her head to her right.

In Z-180, we can discern that she's looking straight ahead or a little to her right.

In Z-190, about two seconds before JFK is hit in the lower neck/upper back by CE-399, she's looking far to her right -- as is JFK, who's waving to Mary Woodward and her three journalism colleagues. (Woodward did say in her 11/23/63 Dallas Morning News article that both JFK and Jackie turned and waved to them.)

https://assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z190.jpg

https://assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/

Note: JFK had turned his head quickly and consciously to his left in Z-144 in response to Oswald's early, missing-everything, shot.

[Tom Graves]

[...]

You wrote the following in your previous post:

"Jackie Kennedy stated that she was looking at the crowd to her left right until the point where Kennedy was struck in the throat. Look at the frames prior to that and she is looking to her right the whole time. Why would she lie? Did she lie or was she confused?"

My reply, in case you missed it:

Jackie was already looking to her left at Z-143 when she started turning her head a bit farther and was photographically "captured," with a concerned look on her face, in Robert Croft's Z-161 photo.

Around Z-175 she started turning her head to her right.

In Z-180, we can see that she's looking straight ahead or a little to her right.

In Z-190, about two seconds before JFK is hit in the lower neck/upper back by CE-399, she's looking far to her right -- as is JFK, who's waving to Mary Woodward and her three journalism colleagues. (Woodward did say in her 11/23/63 Dallas Morning News article that both JFK and Jackie turned and waved to them.)

https://assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z190.jpg

https://assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/

Note: JFK had turned his head quickly and consciously to his left in Z-144 in response to Oswald's early, missing-everything, shot.

[Tom Graves]

Answer my question about the hypothetical in my last post and we'll go from there. Don't side track it, just answer it as if you were a jury member.

I'm not going to get involved in your inane games, Slater.

You asked a question about Jackie, and I answered you.

If you'll actually read my answer and look at the pertinent Zapruder frames, you might, despite your agonizing cognitive dissonance, actually learn something.

[Tom Graves]

[...]

I said "inane," but if you think your games are "insane," too, I won't argue with you.

Regardless, in your earlier post you asked me a question about Jackie, and I answered you.

The least you could do is thank me for having done so.

[Tom Graves]

You gave me your interpretation of why Jackie's testimony doesn't tally with the Zapruder film and that's all it is - an interpretation since you are not an expert in this field. The real reason for the two not tallying and for JBC's testimony not tallying with the Zapruder film as far as I'm concerned remains unknown.

You said: "You're not an expert in this field."

What "field" are you referring to, Slater?

Anyone with an open mind will discern that Jackie is looking to her left in, for example, Z-161, that she's looking straight ahead or a little to her right in Z-180, and that she's looking to her far-right in Z-190.

The reason Jackie's testimony didn't "tally" with what we see her doing in the Zapruder film right before her husband was struck in the lower neck/upper back by CE-399 is due to her very human "failure" to remember that, although she'd been looking to her left for a long time, she had turned to her right around Z-175 to look at, and probably smile and wave to, Mary Woodward and her three journalism colleagues.

[Royell Storing]

You gave me your interpretation of why Jackie's testimony doesn't tally with the Zapruder film and that's all it is - an interpretation since you are not an expert in this field. The real reason for the two not tallying and for JBC's testimony not tallying with the Zapruder film as far as I'm concerned remains unknown.
You will never be able to determine if the Zapruder film is admissible because the chain of command is questionable. I'd watch the link I've provided to determine that for yourself. OK I'll thank you for your interpretation if that helps.
But.......if the film cannot be verified and Dino Brugioni who first worked on the film is certain it is different from the original then we've got a problem on our hands haven't we? The hypothetical I provided is valid in terms of comparison but you side tracked it. The reason you side tracked it is because if you answer it honestly then you've by default destroyed the credibility of the Zapruder film.

   You neglected to mention the Zapruder Film that CBS Dan Rather viewed/described to the World during his multiple broadcasts the very weekend of the JFK Assassination. Rather was even intro'd by CBS News Anchor Walter Cronkite. The Dan Rather broadcasts were highly regarded at the time they were made. Rather described the Zapruder Film showing the JFK Limo turning onto Elm St along with his describing other things on the film that are Not on the Current Zapruder Film. 

[Royell Storing]

Some good points. But you'd need testimony from Rather to establish if that is the case. If you could find that, it would be helpful.
....James.

  At least 1 of the actual Dan Rather CBS broadcasts done that weekend is posted on You Tube. This is no secret.