Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Dr. Gary Aguilar's Two-Shot Analysis  (Read 249 times)

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1901
Re: Dr. Gary Aguilar's Two-Shot Analysis
« Reply #7 on: Yesterday at 11:38:33 PM »
LP--

I largely concur with your sentiments. In fact, many associated with the EF-JFKA have died off, and the remaining often reminisce about the 1960s, which is still the defining decade in all history, in their view.

Like Larry Hancock, I conclude the WC and FBI generally followed President LBJ's instructions that nothing be found out about the JFKA that could trigger a nuke war. That is to say, no leads back to Havana or Moscow.

That may seem farfetched today, but in 1962 the US very nearly went to a nuke war with Russia over Cuba. LBJ, like everybody else, lived with the daily specter of A-bombs from the sky in October 1962 (as did myself).

Due to my read of the Z-film, I contend that the cadence of shots cannot be explained by a lone gunsel armed with a single-shot-per-bolt-action rifle.

I suspect LHO was the TSBD shooter, but there had to be another shooter too.

The conspiracy could be that, only two people.

LHO was dead with 48 hours, and his confederate---who knows?

If LHO's confederate was waxed by G2-DGI, dead men tell no tales. And the people waxing the second gunsel did not know why they perped the deed, or they were misinformed.

Indeed, G2-DGI'ers may have suspected one of their assets went rogue and worked with LHO, and so they then waxed that asset, based on a reasonable suspicion. 

One sad aspect of this: Moscow and IRGC $ has warped JFKA narratives, as understood by many.

If you have credible evidence that Oswald had one or more confederates, please provide that. Otherwise, you're just blowing smoke.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Dr. Gary Aguilar's Two-Shot Analysis
« Reply #7 on: Yesterday at 11:38:33 PM »


Online Jarrett Smith

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 235
Re: Dr. Gary Aguilar's Two-Shot Analysis
« Reply #8 on: Today at 12:46:53 AM »
Dr. Gary Aguilar gives his view of two shots striking JFK on 11.22, including one shot from the GK.

Aguilar is obviously intelligent, literate and informed on topic.

Interesting presentation, whether one agrees or not.

Caveat emptor, and draw your own conclusions.


The issue I have is the first shot at Z313 they have from the knoll, but we know for a fact his head is pushed forward first before going backwards. They are using the acoustics evidence which is wrong.

Online Benjamin Cole

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 902
Re: Dr. Gary Aguilar's Two-Shot Analysis
« Reply #9 on: Today at 02:08:19 AM »
JS-

I could never make heads or tails of any of the acoustics evidence.

I have looked at Z-film more times than I could ever want.

Gov. JBC is pushed forward ~Z-295, and JFK is shot Z-313.

Connally: I was knocked over, just doubled over by the force of the bullet. It went in my back and came out my chest about 2 inches below and the left of my right nipple. The force of the bullet drove my body over almost double and when I looked, immediately I could see I was just drenched with blood. (1 HSCA 42)

The above happens about ~Z-295.

In the Z-film, it sure looks like JFK's head is reacting to a shot from the GK. But who knows? Maybe there is a "carom effect" from a rear shot in combo with a back brace.

The "bang....bang-bang" cadence heard on 11.22 tends to rule out a lone gunsel armed with a single-shot-per-bolt-action rifle.

I have reasonable doubts LHO acted alone.

 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Dr. Gary Aguilar's Two-Shot Analysis
« Reply #9 on: Today at 02:08:19 AM »