Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
John Corbett

Author Topic: Dr. Gary Aguilar's Two-Shot Analysis  (Read 147 times)

Online Benjamin Cole

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 901
Dr. Gary Aguilar's Two-Shot Analysis
« on: Yesterday at 03:35:32 AM »
Dr. Gary Aguilar gives his view of two shots striking JFK on 11.22, including one shot from the GK.

Aguilar is obviously intelligent, literate and informed on topic.

Interesting presentation, whether one agrees or not.

Caveat emptor, and draw your own conclusions.




JFK Assassination Forum

Dr. Gary Aguilar's Two-Shot Analysis
« on: Yesterday at 03:35:32 AM »


Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4002
Re: Dr. Gary Aguilar's Two-Shot Analysis
« Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 04:13:40 AM »
Dr. Gary Aguilar gives his view of two shots striking JFK on 11.22, including one shot from the GK.

Right up your alley!

Flash-bang in the bushes!

« Last Edit: Yesterday at 04:49:59 AM by Tom Graves »

Offline Lance Payette

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1718
Re: Dr. Gary Aguilar's Two-Shot Analysis
« Reply #2 on: Yesterday at 05:04:06 PM »
Also a good reminder as to the extent to which the JKFA research community comprises mostly OLD - and getting OLDER all the time - white guys. Does anyone seriously think a roomful of doddering old white guys is going to be sitting around obsessing over this stuff 85 years from now? Nah, cartoon JFKs will be hawking products on TV along with cartoon George Washingtons and cartoon Abe Lincolns (but hopefully not cartoon Oswalds or cartoon Trumps; yes, I know, we already have a cartoon Trump  :D).

As I got into the Pitzer/David stuff, this thought occurred to me: While I find the elaborate Lifton/Horne-type body alteration scenarios absurd, it is not inconceivable to me that the mandate to pin the JFKA on Oswald as the lone assassin could have been firmly in place by the night of the autopsy and that basic steps to eliminate body and bullet evidence of another gunman could have been undertaken. This dovetails with my little epiphany that I've previously credited to Larry Hancock - i.e., the cover-up was not necessarily part and parcel of the assassination itself. The evidence would have been altered not "because we were part of a ridiculous conspiracy to pin the JFKA on Oswald but stupidly had gunmen at the front and/or using different ammunition, so now we need to alter the body" but rather "regardless of what the JFKA was all about, we are operating under a mandate that Oswald must be portrayed as a lone assassin for national security reasons." I don't say it's likely, but it's far more likely than the Lifton/Horne-type stuff.

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1887
Re: Dr. Gary Aguilar's Two-Shot Analysis
« Reply #3 on: Yesterday at 05:26:53 PM »
Dr. Gary Aguilar gives his view of two shots striking JFK on 11.22, including one shot from the GK.

Aguilar is obviously intelligent, literate and informed on topic.

Interesting presentation, whether one agrees or not.

Caveat emptor, and draw your own conclusions.


Gary Aguilar is a long time conspiracy kook going back to at least the early 1990s.

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4002
Re: Dr. Gary Aguilar's Two-Shot Analysis
« Reply #4 on: Yesterday at 09:38:01 PM »
Aguilar is obviously intelligent, literate and informed on topic.

Lots of intelligent, literate, "informed-on-a-subject" people are nuts.

Online Benjamin Cole

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 901
Re: Dr. Gary Aguilar's Two-Shot Analysis
« Reply #5 on: Today at 03:53:38 AM »
LP--

I largely concur with your sentiments. In fact, many associated with the EF-JFKA have died off, and the remaining often reminisce about the 1960s, which is still the defining decade in all history, in their view.

Like Larry Hancock, I conclude the WC and FBI generally followed President LBJ's instructions that nothing be found out about the JFKA that could trigger a nuke war. That is to say, no leads back to Havana or Moscow.

That may seem farfetched today, but in 1962 the US very nearly went to a nuke war with Russia over Cuba. LBJ, like everybody else, lived with the daily specter of A-bombs from the sky in October 1962 (as did myself).

Due to my read of the Z-film, I contend that the cadence of shots cannot be explained by a lone gunsel armed with a single-shot-per-bolt-action rifle.

I suspect LHO was the TSBD shooter, but there had to be another shooter too.

The conspiracy could be that, only two people.

LHO was dead with 48 hours, and his confederate---who knows?

If LHO's confederate was waxed by G2-DGI, dead men tell no tales. And the people waxing the second gunsel did not know why they perped the deed, or they were misinformed.

Indeed, G2-DGI'ers may have suspected one of their assets went rogue and worked with LHO, and so they then waxed that asset, based on a reasonable suspicion. 

One sad aspect of this: Moscow and IRGC $ has warped JFKA narratives, as understood by many.


Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4002
Re: Dr. Gary Aguilar's Two-Shot Analysis
« Reply #6 on: Today at 03:56:01 AM »
LP--

I largely concur with your sentiments. In fact, many associated with the EF-JFKA have died off, and the remaining often reminisce about the 1960s, which is still the defining decade in all history, in their view.

Like Larry Hancock, I conclude the WC and FBI generally followed President LBJ's instructions that nothing be found out about the JFKA that could trigger a nuke war. That is to say, no leads back to Havana or Moscow.

That may seem farfetched today, but in 1962 the US very nearly went to a nuke war with Russia over Cuba. LBJ, like everybody else, lived with the daily specter of A-bombs from the sky in October 1962 (as did myself).

Due to my read of the Z-film, I contend that the cadence of shots cannot be explained by a lone gunsel armed with a single-shot-per-bolt-action rifle.

I suspect LHO was the TSBD shooter, but there had to be another shooter too.

The conspiracy could be that, only two people.

LHO was dead with 48 hours, and his confederate---who knows?

If LHO's confederate was waxed by G2-DGI, dead men tell no tales. And the people waxing the second gunsel did not know why they perped the deed, or they were misinformed.

Indeed, G2-DGI'ers may have suspected one of their assets went rogue and worked with LHO, and so they then waxed that asset, based on a reasonable suspicion. 

One sad aspect of this: Moscow and IRGC $ has warped JFKA narratives, as understood by many.

How about a perped lone-gunsel CIAer perp?
« Last Edit: Today at 05:09:54 AM by Tom Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Dr. Gary Aguilar's Two-Shot Analysis
« Reply #6 on: Today at 03:56:01 AM »