Jeff Morley the IRGC $tooge...And Key Luna Com'tee Staffer?

[Karl Kinaski]

That's all you need to know about Morley: In an April 8, 2025, reply on X   (Morley wrote)  "I think Oswald did kill Tippit." --- As far as I know Morley never asked John Armstrong if it was Harvey or Lee. :-)

[Brian Doyle]

The Task Force and re-organizing of The Education Forum are being used to make sure no one is allowed to ask those in control of the forum to explain The Education Forum's handling of the Prayer Man theory and the evidence for it...The forum clearly and unequivocably handled the theory by banning those who disproved it and promoting those who deliberately entered knowingly false claims...This stands in direct contrast to how the forum is currently portraying itself, its moderation, its rules, and its oversight...Iler has crafted a self-serving set of rules designed to pre-emptively incriminate those who were wrongfully banned and is using that set of rules to evade this basic issue that any forum that dared present itself as credible would openly invite instead of increasing the corruption...Ethically, the site is being run backwards just like it was under Gordon and fealty to this dishonesty is being used as a backwards measure for eligibility and acceptance...It is a rotten forum run by a rotten group that no set of sanctimonious rules will save from its rotten corruption...The only honest member was Morley but even he did not do the necessary follow-through his stand required.

[Benjamin Cole]

BD-

I would keep an open mind on Andrew Iler. He is new, deserves a fair hearing and opportunity to do a good job. Seems like a nice guy, and is earnest about public records.

Morley is a dogmatic ideologue and partisan, and that is his right, but it deeply colors his interpretation of the JFKA, and the surrounding environment. 

[Brian Doyle]

Yeah sure Ben...Which is why Iler ignored my e-mail to him...

You are aware that Iler writes articles on Jim DiEugenio's website aren't you?...

Iler enforced the no proxy posting for banned members rule...Simkin was allowed to openly break it by posting Greg Parker's smearing of myself...That rule was made by Gordon specifically to keep me from showing the correct Prayer Man evidence on the board...It assumes the banning was valid...It gives no recourse to members who were wrongfully banned and were victims of Gordon's moderator abuse that Knight seemed to recognize in his posts in the forum reformation thread...Iler intends to enforce the clique...He also intends to make valid complaints against the moderators ban-able offenses...infallibility enforced by banning...The no proxy posting for banned members rule only applies to me...And it only applies to keeping my correct Prayer Man evidence off the board in order to keep the moderation from being exposed for incompetence on the issue...

[Benjamin Cole]

BD

Well, if it makes you feel any better, I was banned for eight months earlier this year by William Niedernut, and the ban is still effective in the Iler era.

Still, I am willing to see how it shakes out in a year or so.

The JFKA research community does tend to attract eccentrics and grudge-holders.

In my view, Prayer man is likely a woman, and almost certainly not LHO. Just IMHO.

[Brian Doyle]

The JFKA research community does tend to attract eccentrics and grudge-holders.

In my view, Prayer man is likely a woman, and almost certainly not LHO. Just IMHO.

Gordon banned me in January 2016 when I tried to show the Davidson Enhancement of Wiegman that clearly showed Sarah Stanton's face on Prayer Man...He banned me for being "Too indisciplined, too insulting, and failing to follow the rules of evidence when told"...Gordon had pulled these non-existent site rules out of thin air and directed them towards myself...He had taken on the task of moderating me personally by riding my back on every post and abusing his authority...The Prayer Man people had grouped up and were sending Gordon Private Messages accusing me of methodological violations that Gordon was using to moderate me without checking if they were valid or not...When I asked to see the specific site rules listed that I had violated and what material of mine violated them Gordon refused, saying he did not have to provide that as grand imperial moderator...Gordon knew he had cheated because right after he banned me he posted that he would moderate any way he pleased and that anyone who didn't like it could leave...It was obvious to me that moderation of technical evidence was over Gordon's head and he wasn't too low to ban an innocent researcher in order to save face...Showing Gordon was an incompetent by means of good research was a ban-able offense...The 90% of the membership who backed their darling researcher Bart Kamp's BS theory were glad for the dirty assist and were glad to see someone who could disprove their pet theory gone...That hasn't changed even though subsequent new evidence 100% vindicated me...Niederhut dodged the whole issue by saying I had "troubles with the moderators" (as if it was my fault)...I was banned for what the Prayer Man people were guilty of...When I tried to get back on the board Mark Knight wrote that he could find no site rules violations by myself in my board record...Gordon ignored that and personally intervened, saying my "nonsense would no longer be tolerated"...The fact my evidence was correct was ignored...Even though Gordon's arrogance almost led to a losing of the entire forum and its content the clique still praises him and enforces his wrongful bans...

Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...