Jeff Morley the IRGC $tooge...And Key Luna Com'tee Staffer?

[Karl Kinaski]

That's all you need to know about Morley: In an April 8, 2025, reply on X   (Morley wrote)  "I think Oswald did kill Tippit." --- As far as I know Morley never asked John Armstrong if it was Harvey or Lee. :-)

[Brian Doyle]

The Task Force and re-organizing of The Education Forum are being used to make sure no one is allowed to ask those in control of the forum to explain The Education Forum's handling of the Prayer Man theory and the evidence for it...The forum clearly and unequivocably handled the theory by banning those who disproved it and promoting those who deliberately entered knowingly false claims...This stands in direct contrast to how the forum is currently portraying itself, its moderation, its rules, and its oversight...Iler has crafted a self-serving set of rules designed to pre-emptively incriminate those who were wrongfully banned and is using that set of rules to evade this basic issue that any forum that dared present itself as credible would openly invite instead of increasing the corruption...Ethically, the site is being run backwards just like it was under Gordon and fealty to this dishonesty is being used as a backwards measure for eligibility and acceptance...It is a rotten forum run by a rotten group that no set of sanctimonious rules will save from its rotten corruption...The only honest member was Morley but even he did not do the necessary follow-through his stand required.

[Benjamin Cole]

BD-

I would keep an open mind on Andrew Iler. He is new, deserves a fair hearing and opportunity to do a good job. Seems like a nice guy, and is earnest about public records.

Morley is a dogmatic ideologue and partisan, and that is his right, but it deeply colors his interpretation of the JFKA, and the surrounding environment. 

[Brian Doyle]

Yeah sure Ben...Which is why Iler ignored my e-mail to him...

You are aware that Iler writes articles on Jim DiEugenio's website aren't you?...

Iler enforced the no proxy posting for banned members rule...Simkin was allowed to openly break it by posting Greg Parker's smearing of myself...That rule was made by Gordon specifically to keep me from showing the correct Prayer Man evidence on the board...It assumes the banning was valid...It gives no recourse to members who were wrongfully banned and were victims of Gordon's moderator abuse that Knight seemed to recognize in his posts in the forum reformation thread...Iler intends to enforce the clique...He also intends to make valid complaints against the moderators ban-able offenses...infallibility enforced by banning...The no proxy posting for banned members rule only applies to me...And it only applies to keeping my correct Prayer Man evidence off the board in order to keep the moderation from being exposed for incompetence on the issue...