Jeff Morley the IRGC $tooge...And Key Luna Com'tee Staffer?

[Brian Doyle]

Get a load of the new site rules Andrew Iler has posted at The Education Forum...And this is all happening under the guise of reforming the site and its rules to correct the previous abuses...The new rules posted by Iler are not new rules...They are a codifying of the worst of Gordon and the the petty dictators who called themselves moderators under his tyrannical rule...The new rules are simply an empowering of the administration and moderators to do anything they please under the color of moderation while incriminating any kind of correct criticism of their wrong doing...The best way to judge this is to input the forum's handling of the Prayer Man evidence...The new rules are carefully formulated in order to excuse the moderators for their criminal mishandling of the Prayer Man evidence while incriminating those who tried to press the correct evidence...What Iler is doing is just a hardening of Gordon's previous draconian self-serving rules in order to solidify the clique...It is an organizing of an insider group of members who are using way over-formulated rules to protect themselves while vilifying those who try to correct their wrong doing...

When I was rejected for re-admission to the forum I asked both Beckett and Knight how they justified with-holding the correct Prayer Man evidence from their members...Both Beckett and Knight refused to answer...If you take the set of rules Iler just wrote up and process the malfeasance of The Education Forum's moderation on the Prayer Man issue through them you will find that they fully accommodate the violators getting away with intentionally false claims and those who protest them being moderated and banned...The rather fascist, self-serving set of rules Iler just established is designed to pre-emptively disallow any questioning of the Forum's role in perpetuating dubious research practices like those of moderator Sandy Larsen who used his site authority to make the ridiculous claim that the 6th Floor Museum 1st generation copy of Darnell was a CIA forgery...That claim, coming from a moderator, places the forum in Cinque-land - as does Iler's partner, Jim DiEugenio's, pushing of a bogus theory before Congress...The clear conflict of interest and personal bias of Iler's affiliations and motives is painfully obvious...Iler is never going to ask DiEugenio why he pushed a theory that he himself admitted was bogus before Congress and that authoritarian set of rules he just posted is the means by which he's going to do it...If you are intelligent those new pompous rules written by Iler are specifically designed to protect those who back Larsen's corruption...And even worse they are dishonestly designed to make it look like the administration is pursuing high research standards when in fact it is just protecting the clique and their rotten claims...You've just seen the deck reshuffled in the clique's favor while dishonestly claiming it is a reforming of the previous wrongs...Watch all the suck-ups who line up to praise Iler...The rules Iler just posted allow The Education Forum to promote provably bad evidence on Prayer Man and punish those who correctly protest it with good research with banning, deletion, defamation, and censorship...To add insult to injury, like Gordon, it makes even pointing this out a ban-able offense...All you need to know is there is no commenting allowed on that new set of rules...

[John Corbett]

TG-

Do you dislike the Donks and the Phants equally?

On any given day...

Lately, with the Mamdani-stan wing of the D-Party becoming ascendant...maybe 60/40 favor for the GOP.

But, in general it is a race to the bottom between these two parties....

I like Marco Rubio.

I like Rubio too and if he's the GOP nominee for POTUS in 2028, I will gladly vote for him. I think the nomination is J. D. Vance's to lose. A lot can happen between now and the early primaries and caucuses in 2028, but I expect Vance to be the nominee. Rubio would make a great #2.

There are no Democrats who I would even consider voting for in 2028. The Democrat Party has become so toxic with their embracing of the Marxist agenda that I won't consider anybody who is willing to put a D next to their name. I like John Fetterman but he isn't going to be on the national ticket and I live in the neighboring state of Ohio so I can't vote for him anyway. If he is going to remain in the Senate, he will have to switch parties because he will be primaried by the Democrats. Arlen Specter made that move in the oppositive direction. There is one other Democrat I like because he shows some common sense and the courage to call out the far left but I can't imagine him gaining any traction even if he does choose to run. That would be Stephen A. Smith who is a long shot to run and end even longer shot to win the nomination. The Commies are now controlling the primary process in the Democrat Party and not just on the coasts. I hope the Dems nominate AOC. It might be enough to make me believe there is a God.

[Tom Scully]

I like Rubio too and if he's the GOP nominee for POTUS in 2028, I will gladly vote for him. I think the nomination is J. D. Vance's to lose. A lot can happen between now and the early primaries and caucuses in 2028, but I expect Vance to be the nominee. Rubio would make a great #2.

There are no Democrats who I would even consider voting for in 2028. The Democrat Party has become so toxic with their embracing of the Marxist agenda that I won't consider anybody who is willing to put a D next to their name. I like John Fetterman but he isn't going to be on the national ticket and I live in the neighboring state of Ohio so I can't vote for him anyway. If he is going to remain in the Senate, he will have to switch parties because he will be primaried by the Democrats. Arlen Specter made that move in the oppositive direction. There is one other Democrat I like because he shows some common sense and the courage to call out the far left but I can't imagine him gaining any traction even if he does choose to run. That would be Stephen A. Smith who is a long shot to run and end even longer shot to win the nomination. The Commies are now controlling the primary process in the Democrat Party and not just on the coasts. I hope the Dems nominate AOC. It might be enough to make me believe there is a God.

You like Venezuela's new viceroy. Your post is scary. If you move any further to the right of the spectrum, you risk falling over the edge!
You're so extreme, you referred to the Democratic party by using an epithet.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democrat_Party_(epithet)

https://www.usatoday.com › story › news › politics › 2026 › 01 › 04 › marco-rubio-takes-charge-venezuela › 88008997007

Marco Rubio to 'run' Venezuela with Maduro's inner circle
Jan 4, 2026 As the question of who's in charge of Venezuela looms, Marco Rubio prepares to work with Delcy Rodriguez, sworn in after Maduro's capture.

https://www.bostonherald.com/2026/06/18/us-kills-three-on-boat/
US strike on an alleged drug boat kills 3 in the eastern Pacific Ocean
July 12, 2026
The military did not provide evidence that the vessel was ferrying drugs. At least 211 have been killed in such strikes since September..

https://www.justsecurity.org/137325/us-cuba-embargo-international-law/
April 29, 2026
.....
In this article, we examine the international law dimensions of the U.S. campaign against Cuba. As we will explain, whatever one calls what the United States is doing — blockade, embargo, oil denial campaign — it is not a “blockade” in the sense of the law of naval warfare, for no international armed conflict with Cuba exists. The applicable bodies of law are instead the U.N. Charter’s prohibition on the threat or use of force and the customary international law rule of non-intervention.

Blockade Under the Law of Naval Warfare?

Remember Nuremberg?

https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/2026/03/secretary-of-state-marco-rubio-remarks-to-press-6/
Secretary of State Marco Rubio Remarks to Press
Mar 2, 2026SECRETARY RUBIO: There absolutely was an imminent threat, and the imminent threat was that we knew that if Iran was attacked - and we believe they would be attacked - that they would immediately come after us, and we were not going to sit there and absorb a blow before we responded...

journals.law.harvard.edu

https://journals.law.harvard.edu/ilj/2017/04/continued-debate-over-the-crime-of-aggression-a-supreme-international-irony/
....
Continued Debate Over the Crime of Aggression: A Supreme International ...
The Charter defined "crimes against peace" as the "planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a Common Plan or Conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing."
.....
....At Nuremberg, it was the United States that pressed for including aggressive war-making as an indictable offense.[9] The Charter defined “crimes against peace” as the “planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a Common Plan or Conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing.”[10] It went on to specify that “[l]leaders, organizers, instigators and accomplices participating in the formulation or execution of a Common Plan or Conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing crimes are responsible for all acts performed by any persons in execution of such plan.”[11]..

https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/international-crime-and-justice/crime-of-aggression/6F12A1F54C3724553D7E2EF7DCEF68B1
The Crime of Aggression (Chapter 43) - International Crime and Justice
International Crime and Justice - November 2010 The crime of aggression, or crime against peace, has been famously labeled as the "supreme international crime" by Robert H. Jackson, the Chief American Prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials. Of the twenty-two former Nazi leaders tried in Nuremberg, twelve...

[Tom Scully]

Here Jeff Morley says the IRGC is not so bad...the real danger is in Riyadh.

How long has Morley been carrying water for the iRGC? Paid or not?

https://newrepublic.com/article/153537/growing-obsession-linking-iran-terrorism

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump · July 10, 2026, 11:18 PM

1000 Missiles are Locked and Loaded and aimed at the Islamic Republic of Iran, with thousands of more to immediately follow, should the Iranian Government act on its threat, pronounced in many corners of the Globe, to assassinate, or attempt to assassinate, the sitting President of the United States of America, in this case, ME! Orders have already been given, and the U.S. Military is ready, willing, and able, for a one year period of time, subject to extension, to completely decimate and destroy all areas of Iran – PRAISE BE TO ALLAH! President DONALD J. TRUMP

[Benjamin Cole]

TC--

DJT strikes me as a loose cannon rolling around on deck, especially in his Truth Social posts.

But, no matter DJT's flaws, or America's flaws, they pale in comparison to Putin, and the IRGC.

Western liberal democracies are not perfect, but they are pretty good.

Putin and the IRGC are ugly x 100.

Why Western leftists have taken to valorizing Putin, the IRGC and terrorist proxies...staggers the imagination.

Why Morley is posting pro-IRGC tweets on "X"...raises questions about Morley's agenda, and why he dog-whistled "Mossad perped the JFKA" while on the Tucker Carlson show.

[Tom Scully]

TG-

Do you dislike the Donks and the Phants equally?

On any given day...

Lately, with the Mamdani-stan wing of the D-Party becoming ascendant...maybe 60/40 favor for the GOP.

But, in general it is a race to the bottom between these two parties....

I like Marco Rubio.

You post the best opinions wealthiest donors' to GOP money can buy!

The "T" is trillion. On election day, 2024, The US Gov's DOJ, FBI, IRS, the Courts, could still hold Musk and Trump accountable.
They do not eviscerate the government on behalf of the vast majority of voters who voted for Trump.
Once the billionaires arrive at the point they've purchased all the goods and services they could ever want, they buy up the government and destroy its
ability to be responsive to anyone other than them.

But here you are, railing against the comparatively powerless mayor of NYC who, on his worst day, is a vastly more ethical public servant responsive to
practical concerns of millions more US residents than Trump and his entire cabinet of billionaires. At most, the Trump regime is responsive to the concerns
and priorities of no more than 0.5% of the US population, approx. 1,700,000 people.

https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/dataviz/dfa/distribute/chart/

Distribution of Household Wealth in the U.S.

[Benjamin Cole]

TS-

You are entitled to your views.

But I am trying to stay on topic: Morley.

Even if the US is a plutocracy, does that excuse Morley dog-whistling "Mossad perped the JFKA" on the Tucker Carlson show, and posting pro-IRGC propaganda on "X"?

Or, in your view (and possibly Morley's), the fact that the US is plutocracy means we must support left-wing and Islamist (or Moscow and IRGC) narratives on the JFKA?