Get a load of the new site rules Andrew Iler has posted at The Education Forum...And this is all happening under the guise of reforming the site and its rules to correct the previous abuses...The new rules posted by Iler are not new rules...They are a codifying of the worst of Gordon and the the petty dictators who called themselves moderators under his tyrannical rule...The new rules are simply an empowering of the administration and moderators to do anything they please under the color of moderation while incriminating any kind of correct criticism of their wrong doing...The best way to judge this is to input the forum's handling of the Prayer Man evidence...The new rules are carefully formulated in order to excuse the moderators for their criminal mishandling of the Prayer Man evidence while incriminating those who tried to press the correct evidence...What Iler is doing is just a hardening of Gordon's previous draconian self-serving rules in order to solidify the clique...It is an organizing of an insider group of members who are using way over-formulated rules to protect themselves while vilifying those who try to correct their wrong doing...
When I was rejected for re-admission to the forum I asked both Beckett and Knight how they justified with-holding the correct Prayer Man evidence from their members...Both Beckett and Knight refused to answer...If you take the set of rules Iler just wrote up and process the malfeasance of The Education Forum's moderation on the Prayer Man issue through them you will find that they fully accommodate the violators getting away with intentionally false claims and those who protest them being moderated and banned...The rather fascist, self-serving set of rules Iler just established is designed to pre-emptively disallow any questioning of the Forum's role in perpetuating dubious research practices like those of moderator Sandy Larsen who used his site authority to make the ridiculous claim that the 6th Floor Museum 1st generation copy of Darnell was a CIA forgery...That claim, coming from a moderator, places the forum in Cinque-land - as does Iler's partner, Jim DiEugenio's, pushing of a bogus theory before Congress...The clear conflict of interest and personal bias of Iler's affiliations and motives is painfully obvious...Iler is never going to ask DiEugenio why he pushed a theory that he himself admitted was bogus before Congress and that authoritarian set of rules he just posted is the means by which he's going to do it...If you are intelligent those new pompous rules written by Iler are specifically designed to protect those who back Larsen's corruption...And even worse they are dishonestly designed to make it look like the administration is pursuing high research standards when in fact it is just protecting the clique and their rotten claims...You've just seen the deck reshuffled in the clique's favor while dishonestly claiming it is a reforming of the previous wrongs...Watch all the suck-ups who line up to praise Iler...The rules Iler just posted allow The Education Forum to promote provably bad evidence on Prayer Man and punish those who correctly protest it with good research with banning, deletion, defamation, and censorship...To add insult to injury, like Gordon, it makes even pointing this out a ban-able offense...All you need to know is there is no commenting allowed on that new set of rules...
