Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Benjamin Cole

Author Topic: How Mrs. Connally Described Her Husband Being Shot-HSCA  (Read 12069 times)

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1946
Re: How Mrs. Connally Described Her Husband Being Shot-HSCA
« Reply #35 on: July 13, 2026, 11:56:45 AM »
No. The wound showed that the bullet entered on a downward trajectory.  It was 1.5 cm in the longest dimension (the bullet is 3.0 cm long) and was drawn as an ellipse with its long axis in the vertical direction:

You are assuming that the bullet did not deflect.  But it must have imparted significant momentum to JBC in order for the bullet to have made such an impact sensation in JBC's back.  The only way that happens is if it changes direction suddenly.

That might be one of the dumbest things you've ever written.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: How Mrs. Connally Described Her Husband Being Shot-HSCA
« Reply #35 on: July 13, 2026, 11:56:45 AM »


Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1995
    • SPMLaw
Re: How Mrs. Connally Described Her Husband Being Shot-HSCA
« Reply #36 on: July 14, 2026, 06:00:03 PM »
That might be one of the dumbest things you've ever written.
Which part is dumb? The Shaw diagram or Newton’s laws?

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1946
Re: How Mrs. Connally Described Her Husband Being Shot-HSCA
« Reply #37 on: July 14, 2026, 10:44:43 PM »
Which part is dumb?

Which part is not?

Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1995
    • SPMLaw
Re: How Mrs. Connally Described Her Husband Being Shot-HSCA
« Reply #38 on: July 15, 2026, 04:20:32 PM »

Which part is not?
Interesting form of debate. I post a response in the form of Dr. Shaw’s drawing.  I also post an explanation of why the evidence implies that the bullet changed direction upon hitting JBC in the fifth rib.   You call the post dumb.  I then ask which one is dumb. And your response asks me to explain which one isn’t dumb.

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1946
Re: How Mrs. Connally Described Her Husband Being Shot-HSCA
« Reply #39 on: July 15, 2026, 06:22:38 PM »
Interesting form of debate. I post a response in the form of Dr. Shaw’s drawing.  I also post an explanation of why the evidence implies that the bullet changed direction upon hitting JBC in the fifth rib.   You call the post dumb.  I then ask which one is dumb. And your response asks me to explain which one isn’t dumb.

Seems like a perfectly reasonable question.

Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1995
    • SPMLaw
Re: How Mrs. Connally Described Her Husband Being Shot-HSCA
« Reply #40 on: July 16, 2026, 10:37:12 PM »
Seems like a perfectly reasonable question.
So Dr. Shaw’s diagram is so wrong as to justify calling it dumb?

Online Ted Sager

  • Subscriber
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Re: How Mrs. Connally Described Her Husband Being Shot-HSCA
« Reply #41 on: Today at 03:37:39 AM »
Connally was hit with head shot fragments from K head shot. As C fell back he held his wrist up catching fragments from Head shot. He was directly down range from hidden gunman, who's location shows in Z-film. A perfect square shadow appears in bushes left of motorcade. About half way down the block wall just before the second set of blocks with holes through them.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: How Mrs. Connally Described Her Husband Being Shot-HSCA
« Reply #41 on: Today at 03:37:39 AM »