Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Andrew Mason, Joseph Sanchez

Author Topic: How Mrs. Connally Described Her Husband Being Shot-HSCA  (Read 5124 times)

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1802
Re: How Mrs. Connally Described Her Husband Being Shot-HSCA
« Reply #35 on: July 13, 2026, 11:56:45 AM »
No. The wound showed that the bullet entered on a downward trajectory.  It was 1.5 cm in the longest dimension (the bullet is 3.0 cm long) and was drawn as an ellipse with its long axis in the vertical direction:

You are assuming that the bullet did not deflect.  But it must have imparted significant momentum to JBC in order for the bullet to have made such an impact sensation in JBC's back.  The only way that happens is if it changes direction suddenly.

That might be one of the dumbest things you've ever written.

Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1945
    • SPMLaw
Re: How Mrs. Connally Described Her Husband Being Shot-HSCA
« Reply #36 on: Yesterday at 06:00:03 PM »
That might be one of the dumbest things you've ever written.
Which part is dumb? The Shaw diagram or Newton’s laws?

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1802
Re: How Mrs. Connally Described Her Husband Being Shot-HSCA
« Reply #37 on: Yesterday at 10:44:43 PM »
Which part is dumb?

Which part is not?

Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1945
    • SPMLaw
Re: How Mrs. Connally Described Her Husband Being Shot-HSCA
« Reply #38 on: Today at 04:20:32 PM »

Which part is not?
Interesting form of debate. I post a response in the form of Dr. Shaw’s drawing.  I also post an explanation of why the evidence implies that the bullet changed direction upon hitting JBC in the fifth rib.   You call the post dumb.  I then ask which one is dumb. And your response asks me to explain which one isn’t dumb.

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1802
Re: How Mrs. Connally Described Her Husband Being Shot-HSCA
« Reply #39 on: Today at 06:22:38 PM »
Interesting form of debate. I post a response in the form of Dr. Shaw’s drawing.  I also post an explanation of why the evidence implies that the bullet changed direction upon hitting JBC in the fifth rib.   You call the post dumb.  I then ask which one is dumb. And your response asks me to explain which one isn’t dumb.

Seems like a perfectly reasonable question.