Wow, so you wouldn't recommend a single pro-conspiracy book to a newcomer...
That's correct, I wouldn't.
But if I was being forced at gunpoint by a foaming-at-the-mouth conspiracy fantasist to recommend just one conspiracy-leaning JFKA book, it would be this one by Gus Russo:
But there are some big problems with that book too, which I talk about
HERE.
...and you'd recommend the Warren Commission's report to a newcomer but not the House Select Committee on Assassinations report.
That's correct. And that's because the HSCA's Dictabelt-based conclusion that JFK
"was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy" has since been completely discredited and disproven.
But the first five conclusions that we find on
THIS PAGE of the HSCA's Final Report are things that should be read by everybody. (And those 5 findings have never been proven to be wrong.)
On a side note, did you not notice that the thread is about which six books you'd recommend to a newcomer, not which 10 books.
FYI, the 10 books that you list contradict each other on some key issues, such as the location of the rear head entry wound, the trajectory of the back-wound bullet, the location of the back wound, the position of JFK and Connally in the limo during the alleged hit of the single-bullet theory, and the 6.5 mm object on the autopsy skull x-rays.
But each of those books does something that no pro-conspiracy book has ever done --- i.e., follow the
actual evidence in the case to where it all leads—a single gunman named Lee Harvey Oswald—without resorting to conjecture, speculation, guesswork, and unsupportable claims of fake evidence.
