Hollow Points vs. FMJ Bullets

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Zeon Mason

Author Topic: Hollow Points vs. FMJ Bullets  (Read 40 times)

Online Milton Kaiser

  • Subscriber
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Hollow Points vs. FMJ Bullets
« on: Yesterday at 07:49:32 PM »
Hasn't anyone considered That a Full metal jacket (the only projectile for any military rifle) makes ONLY thru and thru wounds ? It is Specifically made NOT to fragment. But the Only thing that can make a mans head vaporize is a Hollow Point projectile. The Kind Texas Ranchers would load into their deer rifle, to turn a cayote into nothing but fur? Does anybody understand this point? TWO entirely different wound patterns, TWO entirely different bullets, TWO Shooters.
LHO, for all we know didn't have a clue. Yes there is other so called evidence RE: LHO - but Those are other topics. The most damning is the 'backyard photos'. But, I think there is an interpretation to be discussed. It Strikes me Odd that everything in the photo (Proven), belongs to Michael Paine (Clothes, shoes, holster, et. al.) ? Again another day, sorry I brought it up. But, food for thought.

Online Michael T. Griffith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1588
    • JFK Assassination Website
Re: Hollow Points vs. FMJ Bullets
« Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 08:16:33 PM »
Hasn't anyone considered That a Full metal jacket (the only projectile for any military rifle) makes ONLY thru and thru wounds ? It is Specifically made NOT to fragment. But the Only thing that can make a mans head vaporize is a Hollow Point projectile. The Kind Texas Ranchers would load into their deer rifle, to turn a cayote into nothing but fur? Does anybody understand this point? TWO entirely different wound patterns, TWO entirely different bullets, TWO Shooters.

You are absolutely correct, but no lone-gunman theorist here will admit it, no matter how much evidence you present that proves it. As far as I can tell, they can't even bring themselves to read the evidence. I have discussed much of this evidence in the following two threads:

Undeniable Proof of Fraud: The Impossible JFK Autopsy Brain Photos
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,4609.0.html

LNers Can't Explain the Two Back-of-Head Bullet Fragments
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,3641.0.html

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Hollow Points vs. FMJ Bullets
« Reply #2 on: Yesterday at 10:29:46 PM »
You are absolutely correct, but no lone-gunman theorist here will admit it, no matter how much evidence you present that proves it. As far as I can tell, they can't even bring themselves to read the evidence. I have discussed much of this evidence in the following two threads:

Undeniable Proof of Fraud: The Impossible JFK Autopsy Brain Photos
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,4609.0.html

LNers Can't Explain the Two Back-of-Head Bullet Fragments
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,3641.0.html

LNs are smart enough to know that a FMJ bullet fired directly into a skull is going to deform much more than one that passed through the soft tissue of two men's bodies and which tumbled going through the second one before striking a rib. The bullet would have been traveling much slower by the time it struck JBC's wrist which is why it only was able to make a shallow entry into JBC thigh.

The CTs seem to be arguing out of both sides of their mouths. They tell us CE399 should have been more deformed than it was while telling us the bullet which struck JFK's skull shouldn't have deformed as much as it did. Is there a Goldilocks amount of deformity for a FMJ Carcano bullet? One that is just right?

Online Mark Ulrik

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 72