Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The final shot... from the bridge...  (Read 7304 times)

Offline Lance Payette

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1644
Re: The final shot... from the bridge...
« Reply #21 on: May 14, 2026, 12:28:53 AM »
Why do Jake's Guy and the guy next to him look like they are both wearing hoodies? I don't recall anyone wearing hoodies in 1963. Are they time travelers, in which case they perhaps would have been invisible to the others on the bridge (but not to the camera, which is not fooled even by time travelers)? I congratulate Jake for finding an image where, yes, I can actually see a guy, and yes, he actually does seem to be holding something. It looks like the way a press photographer would be holding a large format camera, but why would time travelers be using large format cameras - unless, perhaps, they are time travelers from the past?

Edit: As it turns out, hoodies date to WAY before 1963. So much for the time traveler theory. The two guys do look spooky and vaguely demonic, but I'll let it go. I have no idea what the device is, but isn't a scope on a rifle. It appears to be attached to the front of whatever he's holding, like a telephoto lens on a camera.
« Last Edit: May 14, 2026, 08:37:44 PM by Lance Payette »

Offline Jake Maxwell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 801
Re: The final shot... from the bridge...
« Reply #22 on: May 15, 2026, 05:06:34 PM »
Why do Jake's Guy and the guy next to him look like they are both wearing hoodies? I don't recall anyone wearing hoodies in 1963. Are they time travelers, in which case they perhaps would have been invisible to the others on the bridge (but not to the camera, which is not fooled even by time travelers)? I congratulate Jake for finding an image where, yes, I can actually see a guy, and yes, he actually does seem to be holding something. It looks like the way a press photographer would be holding a large format camera, but why would time travelers be using large format cameras - unless, perhaps, they are time travelers from the past?

Edit: As it turns out, hoodies date to WAY before 1963. So much for the time traveler theory. The two guys do look spooky and vaguely demonic, but I'll let it go. I have no idea what the device is, but isn't a scope on a rifle. It appears to be attached to the front of whatever he's holding, like a telephoto lens on a camera.

Hoodies... or hats to make them look like railroad workers?
A gun or camera?
I think either should raise suspicion and compel further investigation... (And where are the photos?)
But regardless, his posture looks like he's taking aim at something...


Offline Jake Maxwell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 801
Re: The final shot... from the bridge...
« Reply #23 on: Yesterday at 11:50:49 PM »

Was there any investigation of this person sitting behind the bridge whom Cancellare caught on camera seconds after the assassination?




Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3865
Re: The final shot... from the bridge...
« Reply #24 on: Yesterday at 11:56:12 PM »
I wonder, Jake, if you fully understand the damage you do.

Offline Lance Payette

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1644
Re: The final shot... from the bridge...
« Reply #25 on: Today at 12:00:51 AM »
I wonder, Jake, if you fully understand the damage you do.

 ::) Oh, the irony.  ::)

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3865
Re: The final shot... from the bridge...
« Reply #26 on: Today at 12:13:53 AM »
::) Oh, the irony.  ::)

The irony of you posting this is truly Meta.
Tinfoil Nutters such as yourself are just as damaging but at least Jake isn't aware of the damage he does.
At least he doesn't mean it.
What kind of loser spends his time upholding the ridiculous lies of the Warren Commission?
What kind of loser defends the Warren Commission 63 years after the fact?
Get a life.

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1634
Re: The final shot... from the bridge...
« Reply #27 on: Today at 12:25:40 AM »
The irony of you posting this is truly Meta.
Tinfoil Nutters such as yourself are just as damaging but at least Jake isn't aware of the damage he does.
At least he doesn't mean it.
What kind of loser spends his time upholding the ridiculous lies of the Warren Commission?
What kind of loser defends the Warren Commission 63 years after the fact?
Get a life.

Those who defend the WC are defending the truth. The one and only truth. You are entitled to believe any ridiculous scenario you want but there is only one truth. If you reject that one, you aren't entitled to a different one of your liking.