Gov. John Connally Grips His White Stetson Hat at Z-272

[John Corbett]

All pretext by you. Disputed and corroborated as false by Phil Willis, Hugh Betzner, Sam Holland and Rosemary Willis.

Who appointed those people as arbiters of truth?

If every witness is accurate in their recollections of how the shooting happened, then it happened a dozen or more different ways. For everything any witness has said, you can find another witness who disputes that. That's why I rely on forensic evidence to tell me what happened. It tells us which witnesses got which parts right.

[Michael Capasse]

If every witness is accurate in their recollections of how the shooting happened, then it happened a dozen or more different ways

...and you can pick and choose the ones you like.
  that's what you do.

[John Corbett]

...and you can pick and choose the ones you like.
  that's what you do.

Yes one can pick and choose which ones they like which is what most conspiracy theories are based on. I choose to let the forensic evidence tell me which ones to like. It gives me a much clearer picture of what happened.

If this were a game of Clue, the winning answer would be Oswald did it with the Carcano from the TSBD.

[Michael Capasse]

Yes one can pick and choose which ones they like which is what most conspiracy theories are based on. I choose to let the forensic evidence tell me which ones to like. It gives me a much clearer picture of what happened.

There is nothing forensic or even valid in cherry-picking witness statements to a pretext while ignoring corroborated conflicts.

If this were a game of Clue, the winning answer would be Oswald did it with the Carcano from the TSBD.

broken evidence short of proof.

[John Corbett]

There is nothing forensic or even valid in cherry-picking witness statements to a pretext while ignoring corroborated conflicts.

Such as?

broken evidence short of proof.

Since all the forensic evidence points to Oswald and nobody else, Oswald deniers have no choice but to claim it's the evidence that is invalid.

[Michael Capasse]

Such as?

read much?

Once again, you talk out of two sides of your mouth.

There is no sound on any film. You are backing into your a preset conclusion with no basis of fact.
You said witnesses cannot be relied on and are often times wrong. How do you know JBC was correct about when he turned?
He disputed the SBT directly. You cherry pick what you want.

Phil Willis took his number 5 picture when he heard a shot. That was about Z-frame 202.
Hugh Betzner took his number 3 picture and was winding his camera when he heard the same shot.
Sam Holland, was on the bridge. He heard the same shot when JFK reached for his brow. That occurs about Z-204.

Look at Betzner 3 and Willis 5 - see where the car is between two pictures. WC wouldn't. Look at "Black Dog Man" in both pictures.
A human figure taken with 2 different cameras - both oddly without any flesh tone or distinct characteristics. (a black man huh?)
Rosemary told the HSCA: Ms. Willis stated that she was present with her father and a sister in the area of the grass section of the plaza at
the time of the Presidential motorcade on November 22, 1963. The other was a person who was standing just behind the
concrete wall near the triple underpass. "That person appeared to "disappear the next instant."

How do you know when Rosemary Willis stopped and why? - She ran ahead of the limo - how do you know she
wasn't looking back for the car. Her father told Shaw Trial he called her name - How do you know she didn't turn for that ?
She stopped for a shot. - When was the shot? You don't know. Witnesses are often wrong (but only when you want).

  Your time line isn't proof of anything. It is no more valid than what is written above.

Such as?Since all the forensic evidence points to Oswald and nobody else, Oswald deniers have no choice but to claim it's the evidence that is invalid.

WC defenders have no choice but to claim the evidence points to Lee regardless of any direct conflicts.

[Michael Capasse]

DUPLICATE