Robert Groden claims has original Wiegman film, says Prayerman is not LHO

[Royell Storing]

That's what I suspect, It seems like a good bet to me.

The Headline words "The Man Who Destroyed The "Prayerman" Theory - MacRae Hits The Jackpot" springs to mind. 

    Thanks for confirming that you do believe that might be the same female.
    Does your "MacRae" reference reflect back on Kamp? I believe that you follow him closer than I do. I like giving the JFK Images that Kamp posts a once over, but I also do the same with the JFK Image postings of  "OneTrueFlag Here". Though both of these guys push JFK assassination ideas that are way out there.

[Duncan MacRae]

Does your "MacRae" reference reflect back on Kamp? I believe that you follow him closer than I do.

I don't follow Bart Kamp.

Willis + Darnell = Prayer Woman





   
     
       

[Paul J Cummings]

Bart has done some great work but I don't believe Prayerman is LHO. It has always looked to me as a female holding a coffee cup.

[John Corbett]

Bart has done some great work but I don't believe Prayerman is LHO. It has always looked to me as a female drinking from a coffee cup.

Close enough

[Duncan MacRae]

Close enough

Undoubtedly, in my mind. 

Looks like she's wearing somnething like this, an opened Worker's Overall with Pants/Trousers, underneath

[Royell Storing]

  Personally, I believe if Oswald had been standing back there, Buell Frazier would have seen him. Frazier does not remember seeing him back there. Also, that landing was very shallow on 11/22/63. It has been changed since then and is deeper today. Back then, the shallowness of that landing would have put a recognizable figure like Oswald in Frazier's peripheral vision at the slightest (R) turn of his head. Frazier trained Oswald, drove him home weekly, etc. He would have remembered seeing Oswald, if even at a quick glance.
  Going to Dealey Plaza today and thinking you are seeing it as it was on 11/22/63, is like viewing the movie "JFK" and thinking ALL of the film footage was shot on 11/22/63 film. You're being misled by both.