Robert Groden claims has original Wiegman film, says Prayerman is not LHO

[Tommy Shanks]

Lots to unpack here. 1) That sure looks like a woman in the doorway and not Oswald or any other man. 2) Robert Groden should be arrested if he did in fact steal original evidentiary materials from the House Select Committee, as sure seems to be the case. 3) Rep. Luna is a moron.

[Royell Storing]

We don't need Groden or the Wiegman film to confirm to the crazies that it isn't Oswald in the Doorway.
A simple comparison with Photograph Willis 21 clearly shows that Prayerman is really Prayerwoman.



We don't need Groden or the Wiegman film to confirm to the crazies that it isn't Oswald in the Doorway.
A simple comparison with Photograph Willis 21 clearly shows that Prayerman is really Prayerwoman.




We don't need Groden or the Wiegman film to confirm to the crazies that it isn't Oswald in the Doorway.
A simple comparison with Photograph Willis 21 clearly shows that Prayerman is really Prayerwoman.

   Seriously? Where's the, "JFK Evidence Police" when you need them?  I intentionally have waited 24hrs for these Don Quixote's to come charging outta the woodwork and challenge the above "evidence". These are the same people that climb my tree when I: (1) Cut down their worshiped Kamp, (2) Proved "That Ain't Haygood", and, (3) Proved " The car is not in the Wiegman Film". Where are they Now? They are now content to simply stand around with their thumb up their caboose. You know who you are!
   I have never bought into the Prayer Man being Oswald stuff. Never! Never seen any evidence to validate that claim. Prayer Man could be anybody, male or female. But to try to disprove it was Oswald by submitting Willis 21? Really? Willis 21 was snapped around 30 minutes after the Kill Shot. And now you wanna compare a figure on Willis 21, to a figure from 30 Seconds after the Kill Shot? This is laughable. Yet, the "JFK Evidence Police" have suddenly disappeared? I guarantee you that if the name Storing was attached to this, we would being seeing WW 3. "Storing Derangement Syndrome" (SDS) is real. 
   I don't mind being held to a higher standard than anyone else around here. I am used to that. I feed off of that. It is why I have made the 2 biggest discoveries around here in years. (1)That Ain't Haygood, and (2) The car is NOT on the Wiegman Film. Groundbreaking! All I ask is that you also demand a modicum of "evidence" from others. Your failure to do so is reducing this place to "Face Book" status. 

[Duncan MacRae]

And now you wanna compare a figure on Willis 21, to a figure from 30 Seconds after the Kill Shot?

So...Using your illogical logic, this genuine Oswald photographed at different times in this two photo composite, might or might not be the genuine Oswald?

[Royell Storing]

So...Using your illogical logic, this genuine Oswald photographed at different times in this two photo composite, might or might not be the genuine Oswald?

      There is no mystery as to the Oswald ID on the 2 images you have posted. Other than with Ralphy. There is a total mystery shroud covering the ID of Prayer Man/Lady. You failed to mention that the images you posted were captured 30 minutes apart. I took the Kamp/Lovelady ID apart with images that were captured within seconds of each other. This is Not the case with what you posted. The time gap between your images should have been made clear to the audience.

[Royell Storing]

  Was just reading a Kamp "Face Book" posting. Kamp is now trashing Groden. The jackals are turning on each other. Not pretty.

[Duncan MacRae]

There is a total mystery shroud covering the ID of Prayer Man/Lady. You failed to mention that the images you posted were captured 30 minutes apart. I took the Kamp/Lovelady ID apart with images that were captured within seconds of each other. This is Not the case with what you posted. The time gap between your images should have been made clear to the audience.

Pay attention, you missed my point.   

There's no mystery concerning who it is not, it is not Oswald, that is all we need to know.

The identity of the Female which would be interesting to know is not important.

In the Wiegman Willis comparison, the time taken between photographs is not relevant or necessary to submit an opinion of the mystery person's Female gender

[John Corbett]

Pay attention, you missed my point.   

There's no mystery concerning who it is not, it is not Oswald, that is all we need to know.

The identity of the Female which would be interesting to know is not important.

In the Wiegman Willis comparison, the time taken between photographs is not relevant or necessary to submit an opinion of the mystery person's Female gender

You hit the nail on the head. As long was we know it is not Oswald, it doesn't matter who it is. The photo would only have significance if it was Oswald and  it could be proven it was taken seconds, not minutes after the assassination. That would have huge ramifications if true but since it is not, it's nothing more than a mildly interesting photo.