Mark Lane and Charles Brehm

[Fred Litwin]

You are missing my point. It is about Lane's intellectual dishonesty. He asked Brehm in the interview where the shots came from, and Brehm answered him. Lane
did not include the answer in his film. But he did infer from Brehm's other statements where the shots came from.

On the other hand, I don't believe the Dallas Times Herald, because Jay Skaggs took a few photographs of Brehm on November 22nd and in his oral history project, says that Brehm, at that time, was
saying the shots came from Houston and Elm.

fred

[Michael Capasse]

You are missing my point. It is about Lane's intellectual dishonesty. He asked Brehm in the interview where the shots came from, and Brehm answered him. Lane
did not include the answer in his film. But he did infer from Brehm's other statements where the shots came from.

On the other hand, I don't believe the Dallas Times Herald, because Jay Skaggs took a few photographs of Brehm on November 22nd and in his oral history project, says that Brehm, at that time, was
saying the shots came from Houston and Elm.

fred

Actually, he never asked from what direction the shots came. He asked what direction the particles flew.
..and your opinion on hearsay from a reporter in an oral history project years later doesn't mean very much.

Mark Lane: Did you see any particles of the President's skull fly when the bullet struck him in the head?
Charles Brehm: I saw a piece fly over, oh, in the area of the curb where I was standing.

Mark Lane: And in which direction did that fly?
Charles Brehm: It seemed to have have come left and back.

[Marjan Rynkiewicz]

You are missing my point. It is about Lane's intellectual dishonesty. He asked Brehm in the interview where the shots came from, and Brehm answered him. Lane
did not include the answer in his film. But he did infer from Brehm's other statements where the shots came from.

On the other hand, I don't believe the Dallas Times Herald, because Jay Skaggs took a few photographs of Brehm on November 22nd and in his oral history project, says that Brehm, at that time, was
saying the shots came from Houston and Elm.
fred

My careful seeing/hearing/reading of Brehm's wordage tells me that at no time did Brehm ever say that he heard shots coming from the TSBD.
Brehm did say where he thort the shots came from. But that is not the same thing.
Brehm said that he heard the shots coming from a building which was not the TSBD.
And he made no subsequent statements re where he heard the shots coming from.
All of his subsequent statements were re where he thort the shots came from.

[Fred Litwin]

I guess you didn't read my post. You should.

Lane DID ask Brehm where the shots came from and Brehm answered him. Lane cut that answer out from the film. We know
this because the uncut film interviews were retrieved from the De Antonio papers in Wisconsin.

fred

[Michael Capasse]

I guess you didn't read my post. You should.

Lane DID ask Brehm where the shots came from and Brehm answered him. Lane cut that answer out from the film. We know
this because the uncut film interviews were retrieved from the De Antonio papers in Wisconsin.

fred

If he cut it out of the film then he made a proper edit.
You're the one that is being dishonest here.

[Tommy Shanks]

If he cut it out of the film then he made a proper edit.
You're the one that is being dishonest here.

Define "proper edit." How is removing a direct answer to a direct question, for no apparent reason, deemed "proper" ??

[John Corbett]

If he cut it out of the film then he made a proper edit.

It was a proper edit for someone who was trying to misrepresent what a witness has said. Mark Lane was a deceitful SOB and it is not at all surprising that he would cut anything a witness said that didn't support the false narrative that Lane was trying to push.

[Royell Storing]

Define "proper edit." How is removing a direct answer to a direct question, for no apparent reason, deemed "proper" ??

   How about we SEE the alleged "uncut film interviews", or transcripts of such before rendering judgement? The plural "interviews" merits caution.