S. M. Holland's "Smoke" on the Grassy Knoll

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: S. M. Holland's "Smoke" on the Grassy Knoll  (Read 691 times)

Online Marjan Rynkiewicz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1018
Re: S. M. Holland's "Smoke" on the Grassy Knoll
« Reply #32 on: Today at 12:02:32 AM »
Donahue was an idiot. I can't say much for anyone who bought into his crap.
Donahue did make a major error. This was re the ricochet re Oswald's missed first shot.
Donahue thort that this hit the road pavement & bits ended up hitting jfk & bits ended up in the limo.
This iz koz he tried to tick all of the boxes re the Xray & witnesses re a bullet hitting the pavement & re bits of bullet in the limo etc.
Hiz other error was that he ignored the evidences that Hickey fired a plurality of shots (at least 4).
And then McLaren came along with JFK the Smoking Gun. And he too failed to see that Hickey fired at least 4 shots.
And then i solved the Hickey thing in 2024.
I uzed the good work of Holland re the ricochet offa the overhead signal arm.
But Holland too had some silly ideas re the ricochet.
And then i solved the ricochet thing in 2023.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4770
Re: S. M. Holland's "Smoke" on the Grassy Knoll
« Reply #33 on: Today at 01:13:54 PM »
Donahue did make a major error. This was re the ricochet re Oswald's missed first shot.
Donahue thort that this hit the road pavement & bits ended up hitting jfk & bits ended up in the limo.
This iz koz he tried to tick all of the boxes re the Xray & witnesses re a bullet hitting the pavement & re bits of bullet in the limo etc.
Hiz other error was that he ignored the evidences that Hickey fired a plurality of shots (at least 4).
And then McLaren came along with JFK the Smoking Gun. And he too failed to see that Hickey fired at least 4 shots.
And then i solved the Hickey thing in 2024.
I uzed the good work of Holland re the ricochet offa the overhead signal arm.
But Holland too had some silly ideas re the ricochet.
And then i solved the ricochet thing in 2023.

    There is ZERO Evidence than a shot hit the "overhead signal arm". You got Holland blowing off about this, and the Sixth Floor Museum giving him the platform to do it, but in FACT, there is literally nothing. Some guy ran into that traffic signal and knocked it down. Gary Mack called Holland about it being down and they went through that thing with a fine tooth comb. Found NOTHING.
    With respect to a possible SA Hickey AR-15 firing spree, I do believe there is evidence of this having happened. I can Not say this "spree" struck JFK, but I do believe there is evidence that those shots did cause damage inside Dealey Plaza. I believe Hickey's AR-15 firing burst went in the general direction of Gordon Arnold. If you are interested let me know. I'll direct you to what I believe is Image Evidence of the damage caused inside Dealey Plaza.

Online Marjan Rynkiewicz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1018
Re: S. M. Holland's "Smoke" on the Grassy Knoll
« Reply #34 on: Today at 01:46:41 PM »
    There is ZERO Evidence than a shot hit the "overhead signal arm". You got Holland blowing off about this, and the Sixth Floor Museum giving him the platform to do it, but in FACT, there is literally nothing. Some guy ran into that traffic signal and knocked it down. Gary Mack called Holland about it being down and they went through that thing with a fine tooth comb. Found NOTHING.
    With respect to a possible SA Hickey AR-15 firing spree, I do believe there is evidence of this having happened. I can Not say this "spree" struck JFK, but I do believe there is evidence that those shots did cause damage inside Dealey Plaza. I believe Hickey's AR-15 firing burst went in the general direction of Gordon Arnold. If you are interested let me know. I'll direct you to what I believe is Image Evidence of the damage caused inside Dealey Plaza.
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2833.192.html
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2833.168.html

https://i.postimg.cc/TPM9r7vX/Hickey-6-shot-burst.jpg




https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/ZTraAfTO2JHfKSBQJC-M56QhbAsGc3-CMDUgTeANoK8agQZTvVt6TpuBMiqVGhoq_SMfIHtHvhfoKrr4QIwq-EpDBpey0QvMcCdawe1KKhRh73y6U3M4vg2MB0evlL9-_MuLAbDZOaPBHd5fbD4N7GUhcIY16bH2vfbqAv99vQ_-nAdYA8I7HVmw8-qQ4oUQ-f51jBeKCSB3lOi91_O4pB5p0afQgFEBIwHxcVBVZkZUQYr9xvelG-mGMzSPL2QWCPa7cy5k3geQBBYitN1Nwfs7XWSZcH0MQN-axhuokhVxWELLbhQ61ZBFSG7bS86mckMpNFFtwcqQ84tmf1PUsOcEFTTa0-uKbuFzQUnyyQ93cGS_NP5_xEAMelsuvj7SRGCCUFxOkSFe1k5XCyNK8jJaztyLcNKs_2T-Sl1czAxXZ89bttNR8-itOcO9qoQ501ahD3yG-K-UlNeaLl8QhD-a3aJiaTqnN5NwVc4KZ-cshscvt3ZWjpJiZKvGR8BWy1-LRu5dbA7nm4W5_9sXzzWQkxE_PbnwzklomEm035OkYbGHuWP-xHBTTRSUEHkLkBoA5zTE9RziNbyJqWn8WW5ZYbjRogTr2daW_TAi_uW-nseYaS06D0MseUkzqUW5-tMBcjgbh645kBa1bnyaLnTOp5kAqr_eHx2mNEjis6p7F7rH1_mNrJvQlRqtPdax6suYMPTyoH7JKgdpZeGKzVl7=w682-h372-no?authuser=0

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/2GpXdoUZ1ScB4NxbFNknmc2JQZjA6CxOGfC30x--4nznz_M1SYgSKjXVS8rEPrDADgDTnReyHMalPFBPVs5TcjibZOtHTc5MQUDZS9gIp9YZYDOjl7j8KgYESbtcl247iZIBJx1G_JVINPmN-oRKxiE3umGIEQpsDFrA8o5yW9UVxMiX9pLStBUd_oAELu8-UIt9CRfuQXyT4Nqd7oDYRVswhL-dKhW9dQo0f9UFIIhUCUSW20nkd2dW5mGXeSKgA3coloVvIXNkCUpXaUaYKI3kqw2XHrG7FLlfbkOqic-L9IxkcHzLV2RFjhZ2tOTnieRyhHANr_NK3cb38AZlM8dIbD5htbMxx98n5W41z9eAL2hnJdRhX-Tk_th8zY-KqT-wZ4UC4zhGnjDwQwOZKMESAYdAmZPbyiD-qEbjYuWR88QGNGiNB1uVzg0u_vN0r2Om-GtW2MLZkhTa44DJTMUJOWtqAZkRzUMmmxbtWRSlusv2uAwstHRgn-Qk6omHLnkrjSLMhuyy-CZMEKCextAkVcsBYEyGnfq4N7Q41BW-SeL9Gohf3NYfxuwJ1In0dDSpTmiDJt3s5XzKBmk11vGDzS-MdDbsKT_exSSmq9T9Y-tmv1mMhCghNBFk54LFmdbYcU64w0PyecBbB_6iSBoLyi0CtGP0I_bvE_bKsPxuWfmAjRTs_HS_n5Rw=w422-h372-no?authuser=0

Online John Corbett

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: S. M. Holland's "Smoke" on the Grassy Knoll
« Reply #35 on: Today at 03:01:10 PM »
It is pure speculation as to what happened with Oswald's first missed shot. We are left to make educated guesses. My guess is the bullet skipped off the pavement, struck the curb in front of James Tague, and kicked up debris which caused Tague's superficial facial wound, but that is hardly an established fact. It's one of the few unanswered questions of the JFK assassination that will likely never be answered with any certainty. We don't need to know that because we know what happened with Oswald's second and third shots. That is a certainty.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4770
Re: S. M. Holland's "Smoke" on the Grassy Knoll
« Reply #36 on: Today at 03:12:33 PM »
It is pure speculation as to what happened with Oswald's first missed shot. We are left to make educated guesses. My guess is the bullet skipped off the pavement, struck the curb in front of James Tague, and kicked up debris which caused Tague's superficial facial wound, but that is hardly an established fact. It's one of the few unanswered questions of the JFK assassination that will likely never be answered with any certainty. We don't need to know that because we know what happened with Oswald's second and third shots. That is a certainty.

  "Educated guesses"?  "We don't need to know..."?  The guy harping about Proof and Evidence is NOW forced into considering, "educated guesses", and then running away with, "We don't need to know..."?  Hilarious back peddling.

Online John Corbett

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: S. M. Holland's "Smoke" on the Grassy Knoll
« Reply #37 on: Today at 03:41:39 PM »
  "Educated guesses"?  "We don't need to know..."?  The guy harping about Proof and Evidence is NOW forced into considering, "educated guesses", and then running away with, "We don't need to know..."?  Hilarious back peddling.

Just because we don't know everything doesn't mean we need to ignore what we do know. We know where Oswald's second and third shots struck. Nothing that could have happened with that first shot changes the fact Oswald's second shot hit JFK in the upper back and went on to seriously wound JBC. His third shot struck JFK it the back of the head causing an unsurvivable massive brain injury. We have proof of that.

There are a number of things we don't know and probably never will. We don't know Oswald's motive nor do we need to know in order to prove he was the assassin. He would be nice to know but because he never admitted to what he did, he never would have told anyone why he did it. He didn't leave behind a manifesto explaining his actions and there was no social media in those days which often gives clues as to the motives off modern day crackpots.

If you want to be anal and take the position that the case is unsolved because we can't prove every single detail, that's your choice. I'm perfectly content knowing that Oswald was the assassin and there isn't a scrap of evidence indicating he had even a single accomplice in his crime and I really don't care where his first shot went.