Why did Oswald go to the movies?

[John Iacoletti]

Trolletti, Brewer does a very good job of describing his encounter with your hero and explaining why he trailed him to the theater.

Thanks for linking the interview, Troll.

Nice evasion.  Quote the exact words that describe what the man "did to arouse his suspicions".

[Steve Howsley]

Not really. He thought he was going to be fired because he obviously thought that he did something deserving of it.

If that's your understanding of his comment then you are WRONG again and have proven to be unable to process even the most basic information.

[Steve Howsley]

So it's absurd just because you call it absurd?  How does one Oswald get arrested in the main theater and taken out the front, another guy get arrested in the balcony, and another guy get taken out the back?  How is one Oswald buying popcorn at 1:07 and another one shooting Tippit?  How does one Oswald exit the front door of the TSDB and walk east on Elm to catch a bus, another one runs down and gets in a Rambler, and a third one goes out the back door of the building?  How is one Oswald at work at the TSBD while another one is buying beer and peco brittle at the Jiffy store?  Those things are what I call absurd.

But I guess it's a lot easier to call people names than to present coherent counter-arguments.

So you don't believe that all of those Oswald 'sightings' are attribute to multiple Oswalds. That's interesting.

[John Iacoletti]

So you don't believe that all of those Oswald 'sightings' are attribute to multiple Oswalds. That's interesting.

The real Oswald was wherever the Warren Commission wanted him to be at any particular time.

[Steve Howsley]

The real Oswald was wherever the Warren Commission wanted him to be at any particular time.

That comment is Fantasy land stuff. Oswald was where the evidence indicates;
the TSBD;
his rooming house;
the Tippet murder scene;
the Texas Theater;
a basement car park;
his grave.

[Jerry Freeman]

Why is it.. that when someone raises a question or doubt about the official story, they are branded as a 'conspiracy theorist' and a 'Kook'?
"If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it, and you will even come to believe it yourself."~~~~~~Joseph Goebbels

[Bill Chapman]

So it's absurd just because you call it absurd?  How does one Oswald get arrested in the main theater and taken out the front, another guy get arrested in the balcony, and another guy get taken out the back?  How is one Oswald buying popcorn at 1:07 and another one shooting Tippit?  How does one Oswald exit the front door of the TSDB and walk east on Elm to catch a bus, another one runs down and gets in a Rambler, and a third one goes out the back door of the building?  How is one Oswald at work at the TSBD while another one is buying beer and peco brittle at the Jiffy store?  Those things are what I call absurd.

But I guess it's a lot easier to call people names than to present coherent counter-arguments.

I guess it's easier to link to Brewer's interview on MF Page 5 and claim he didn't explain why he thought the guy in his window suspicious; yet convenient to ignore MF Page 6 of the same article which indeed explains his reaction to what he saw happening, including the circumstances surrounding the location.

Is Brewer's personal observation unbelievable (or whatever you want to call it) because you say it is?