Why did Oswald go to the movies?

[John Iacoletti]

Duh.

Brewer felt Saint Patsy was trying to evade the cops.

You're just going to have to accept that your client was apprehended due to Brewer's alert and swift reaction.

Trying to imply that Brewer's actions were irrational and that the police response to Postal's call was unwarranted makes you look....uhhhh....'funny'

Hurts, doesn't it ?

How does Saint Brewer's observation make anyone a murder suspect?

The only thing that hurts is what you think passes for a logical argument.

[John Iacoletti]

Wasn't that because Burroughs had thought he must have gone up to tye balcony because he hadn't seen him go past him? Based on previous experiences of kids sneaking in to the theatre going up to the balcony seemed most likely.

But Brewer said that he and Butch went up to the balcony and didn't see anything.

[John Iacoletti]

Again, our dishonest contrarian who responds to every post has neglected to answer the basic question.  If dishonest John is not implying that Brewer was part of some plot relating to Oswald, why does it matter whether Brewer found Oswald suspicious?

It doesn't, Mr. Strawman.

It's laughable that "Richard", who has yet to provide a single verifiable example of me ever being dishonest, and who consistently lies both about the evidence and about what other people on the forum say or do or "imply", and who isn't even honest about his own name has the gall to label anyone else dishonest just because he and his bogus arguments get humiliated on a daily basis.

The question is, on what basis did the police consider the guy Brewer saw to be a suspect in the Tippit murder?

[John Iacoletti]

The DPD responded to the guy seen running in the library in the exact same manner.  They approached him as a potential murder suspect.  He was able to explain himself, however, and was let go.

According to Detective Marvin Buhk, a "Secret Service" man was there and told them that this man was "not a suspect".

  He did not punch a police officer and attempt to shoot him.

You haven't actually demonstrated that Oswald did either.  What's your point?

[Bill Chapman]

Still trying to find the question you're wanting me to answer.

The definition of 'looking funny' you are applying here.

[John Iacoletti]

Oswald's acts are judged in isolation - "He just left Marina money", "He just took a bus", "He just took a cab", "He just went to a movie" - while Brewer's (and other's ) every move is questioned as having nefarious purposes or motive.

Good grief.  If you can't support your own position with facts and evidence, just make up a position for your opponent and argue against that instead.  You're Strawman Junior.

[John Iacoletti]

LOL. No one ever said Brewer called the police.  I said the police received a call reporting a suspicious person.  The record confirms that Postal called the DPD to report a suspicious person.

Keep in mind that Postal never actually saw this person acting suspiciously and most likely never saw him at all.

Police radio description of Tippit suspect:

"I got an eye-ball witness to the get-away man. That suspect in this shooting is a white male, twenty-seven, five feet eleven, a hundred sixty-five, black wavy hair, fair complected, wearing a light grey Eisenhower-type jacket, dark trousers and a white shirt,"

Postal's description to dispatcher of the funny guy Brewer told her he saw:

"explained that he had on this brown sports shirt and I couldn't tell you what design it was, and medium height, ruddy looking to me"

  Now that your lame distraction has failed, are you alleging that Brewer's actions were motivated by his being a conspirator in a plot to frame Oswald?  That appears to be what you are clearly implying,

Why don't you try responding to what people actually say rather than what you think they are "clearly implying"?  You have a lousy track record for mind reading.