Why did Oswald go to the movies?

[Howard Gee]

And to again point to the obvious: this questioning of motive on Brewer's part comes from the very same person who insists we can only look at Oswald's behavior in isolation, stripped of any context and that to ascribe criminal motive or intent to them is not only wrong but rejected with the child like "LOL" response.

Oswald's acts are judged in isolation - "He just left Marina money", "He just took a bus", "He just took a cab", "He just went to a movie" - while Brewer's (and other's ) every move is questioned as having nefarious purposes or motive.

Yep, just like he left work because he figured 'there'd be no more work today', based on the commotion going on outside.

Seems kind of odd that Saint Patsy isn't even slightly interested in what happened, but maybe that's just me.

No time to waste, so why hang around for even a moment ?   There was shoe shopping to be done.  And then Gummy Bears and buttered popcorn.

Saint Patsy just got an early start to the weekend. It's just not fair to read anything else into it.

[Richard Smith]

Who made the call? Be specific and use the evidence.

LOL.  We are going down the usual Caprio rabbit hole.  Are you now claiming the DPD did not receive a call?  Is Postal involved in the plot as well and lying about calling the police?  I have to be "specific and use evidence" for a point that is a matter of record?  While you will not answer a simple question as to whether you are claiming Brewer was part of a plot.

https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338516/m1/1/

[Nicholas Turner]

So, you're admitting that you are not familiar with the evidence. Good of you to do that.

Why not just say what evidence you were referring too? As I've said I don't claim to be an expert and have come back to this topic some tears after my initial interest. I had hoped to have some sensible discussions here but everyone seems to be locked into their positions and into having a go at each other.

[Rob Caprio]

LOL.  We are going down the usual Caprio rabbit hole.  Are you now claiming the DPD did not receive a call?  Is Postal involved in the plot as well and lying about calling the police?  I have to be "specific and use evidence" for a point that is a matter of record?  While you will not answer a simple question as to whether you are claiming Brewer was part of a plot.

https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338516/m1/1/

LOL. We are now going down the Smith "shift the burden" path. You HAVE TO show that a call took place alerting the police to the LHO alleged sighting. Well?

Who called? Be specific and use the evidence.

[Rob Caprio]

Why not just say what evidence you were referring too? As I've said I don't claim to be an expert and have come back to this topic some tears after my initial interest. I had hoped to have some sensible discussions here but everyone seems to be locked into their positions and into having a go at each other.

Why don't you state what your issue is and perhaps I can help you. Unless you are locked into your position of course.

[Nicholas Turner]

Why don't you state what your issue is and perhaps I can help you. Unless you are locked into your position of course.

I don't have an issue, other than with the fact you won't answer a simple question but would rather be confrontational and difficult. Just forget all about it and I'll make a note never to respond to one of your posts again.

[John Iacoletti]

You're the weird one:
You stated 'whatever that means' in relation to 'scared and looking funny'

Still trying to find the question you're wanting me to answer.