10 years ago Sandy Larsen managed to enhance and enlarge Lovelady on the extension and juxtapose the plaid pattern on his shirt with the plaid pattern seen in other photos of Lovelady that day...When enhanced and enlarged in this manner the white, black, and red stripes and patches in Lovelady's plaid shirt matched identically therefore proving a scientific match beyond doubt and ending the issue...I was banned from The Education Forum at the time so I could not participate in this discovery...The only visible Assassination discussion site I could post on at that time was this one so I posted that Larsen's confirmation that the man was Lovelady served to establish the chronology and time stamp of Couch/Darnell proving that it was at the exact time that Frazier said Sarah Stanton turned to him to tell him what Calvery had shouted (actually it is the time period just following that)...I posted that therefore it was required of Larsen, as a person who thrust himself forward on the subject as an expert, to recognize this and respond that his identification of Lovelady therefore logically led to an identification of the time that Frazier said he was talking to Stanton and that Couch/Darnell and that time were exactly the same...Larsen had also photographically identified Calvery on the steps, doubly confirming this time stamp...
Larsen must have been reading because soon after, that post on The Education Forum, that did the excellent skilled photo analysis of Lovelady's plaid pattern in Couch/Darnell, disappeared from the board...I protested but it was ignored...The same Prayer Man hijacker majority that tolerated my wrongful banning from The Education Forum for disproving Prayer Man was the same dishonest membership that tolerated Larsen cheating and taking back what could not be taken back...The true purpose of the moderation on that forum is not enforcing strict academic rules in order to improve rigor...The purpose for Gordon's rogue moderation was to make sure a disliked researcher didn't wade in and hand the Prayer Man people their butts on the Prayer Man issue and show how uncredible the forum was...To add insult to injury, a few years later I saw Larsen post that the man on the steps facing Calvery was Lovelady...The only reason I couldn't make Larsen answer for his amnesia was due to my being censored...The membership didn't even notice and didn't say a word...The reason Larsen called the man on the steps Lovelady was so he could preserve his Prayer Man nonsense and avoid admitting the time...This is the playing field that exists on the JFK internet...One where Andrew Iler, instead of correcting this rogue injustice, posts how to put people on ignore and then locks the thread...
What happens when the 6th Floor Museum copy replicates Larsen's matching of the plaid in Lovelady's shirt?...
Or shows Molina facing Calvery on the steps?...
Photo alteration claims?...
I'm sorry Brian, but you clearly live in some kind of dream world where you believe you can just spin your yarns and that's enough...everyone else has to fall in line.
PROVIDE EVIDENCE.
Provide the image you are referring to.
Cite the thread you are talking about.
Provide a link to this thread.
Do something!Do something that demonstrates you are a credible researcher and not just some dreamer talking nonsense.
I will gladly accept any genuine evidence that is contrary to what I currently believe because that brings me closer to truly understanding.
Please provide some kind of evidence.
Your recollections are not evidence.
For all I know, you could be talking complete sh!t.
How can I know otherwise if you don't actually provide any evidence.
Start with this very simple question - what was the origin of the image Sandy Larsen enhanced?
And provide some kind of link to this thread.
Topic: How Did Bart Kamp Create The Lovelady Image? (Read 160313 times)