Sure I knew. But how about telling the WHOLE STORY. Holland originally claimed a bullet bounced off of the traffic signal itself. When an examination of the signal failed to show anything, he then took a fine tooth comb to the support arm. There he found a mere ding, which could easily have been the result of a very common Southern hail storm. Same old double standard being applied here. Anything claiming to support a shot from the sniper's nest gets an automatic free pass.
Dear Comrade Storing,
What makes you think I think Holland's theory is correct?
Why are you obsessing on Holland's theory?
You do realize, don't you, that Roselle and Scearce's hypothetical "Z-124" is about a second after Holland's hypothetical "Z-107"?
You do realize, don't you, that Brian Roselle has shown that it was possible that James Tague was nicked by a piece of concrete struck off the curb by a largish bullet fragment from the Z-313 head shot?
-- Tom