Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.

[Dan O'meara]

Bumped for Mister Magoo, I mean Danny Boy O'meara:

Lovelady (and probably slender, 5' 9", suit-wearing Shelley) were "captured" by Couch-Darnell as they were walking/running towards "the first railroad track" just as they said they did after speaking with Gloria Calvery (whom we can see on the steps in the same clip), about 25 seconds after the final shot.

No, they weren't.

LOL, Mister Magoo!

PS How do you know your "Shelley" isn't Vice-President and Secretary of the Texas School Book Depository Company, Ochus V. Campbell, who was standing in front of the steps near Truly during the motorcade?

No offence, thomas, but the fact you openly admit you couldn't care less about the evidence, your recent strategy of simply 'fabricating' scenarios and your reliance on Grok has really damaged your credibility.
You never really engage in debate anyway and disappear the second you have to.
I'm not sure what the tinfoil equivalent of a LNer is, but you're it, and I really can be bothered with you.

The identification of Shelley at the bottom of the steps follows seamlessly from the identification of Lovelady on the steps.
I've moved on from your childish insistence that 'it looks like Lovelady to me' and am now dealing with the evidence you couldn't care less about.

[Tom Graves]

Dear thomas,

The identification of Shelley at the bottom of the steps follows seamlessly from the identification of Lovelady on the steps.
I've moved on from your childish insistence that 'it looks like Lovelady to me' and am now dealing with the evidence you couldn't care less about.
[/quote]

Dear dan o'meara,

The evidence, supported by Shelley's and Lovelady's statements, is that they can be seen in Couch-Darnell, walking / running down Elm Stree Extension towards "the first railroad track" about 25 seconds after the final shot.

Your "Shelley" is probably Ochus V. Campbell, Vice President and Secretary of the Texas School Book Depository Company. He was standing in front of the steps, near Roy Truly (who can also be seen standing in front of the steps in Couch-Darnell), during the motorcade.

[Tom Graves]

No offence, thomas, but the identification of Shelley at the bottom of the steps follows seamlessly from the identification of Lovelady on the steps.

Dear dan o'meara,

Your identification of Lovelady on the steps is based on highly dubious witness statements.

Your "Shelly" is probably Ochus V. Campbell, Vice-President and Secretary of the Texas School Book Depository Company, who was standing in front of the steps near Roy Truly (who can also be seen standing in front of the steps in Couch-Darnell about 25 seconds after the final shot, watching Baker run past him to the steps).

-- Tom

[Dan O'meara]

Dear thomas,

The identification of Shelley at the bottom of the steps follows seamlessly from the identification of Lovelady on the steps.
I've moved on from your childish insistence that 'it looks like Lovelady to me' and am now dealing with the evidence you couldn't care less about.


Dear dan o'meara,

The evidence, supported by Shelley's and Lovelady's statements, is that they can be seen in Couch-Darnell, walking / running down Elm Stree Extension towards "the first railroad track" about 25 seconds after the final shot.

Your "Shelley" is probably Ochus V. Campbell, Vice President and Secretary of the Texas School Book Depository Company. He was standing in front of the steps, near Roy Truly (who can also be seen standing in front of the steps in Couch-Darnell), during the motorcade.

 
You need to lay off the sauce and get some sleep.

[Tom Graves]

You need to lay off the sauce and get some sleep.

Dear dan o'meara,

You need to read this again and then go get lost:

Your "identification" of Lovelady on the steps is based on a barely recognizable human face in Couch-Darnell and highly dubious witness statements. Your pivoting "Shelly" is probably Ochus V. Campbell, Vice-President and Secretary of the Texas School Book Depository Company. Campbell was standing in front of the steps near Roy Truly (who can also be seen standing in front of the steps in Couch-Darnell about 25 seconds after the final shot, watching Baker run past him to the steps) during the motorcade.

[Royell Storing]

Dear dan o'meara,

You need to read this again and then go get lost:

Your "identification" of Lovelady on the steps is based on a barely recognizable human face in Couch-Darnell and highly dubious witness statements. Your pivoting "Shelly" is probably Ochus V. Campbell, Vice-President and Secretary of the Texas School Book Depository Company. Campbell was standing in front of the steps near Roy Truly (who can also be seen standing in front of the steps in Couch-Darnell about 25 seconds after the final shot, watching Baker run past him to the steps) during the motorcade.

   Like I said, "Blurry Images". Same stuff we went through with Lovelady being mistakenly ID'd as Oswald on the Altgens Photo. Just wait on these images being cleaned up. There's people probably sitting on better images right now. Just like we saw with the Z Film, Wiegman Film, Couch Film, and Darnell Film.  You guys never learn.

[Dan O'meara]

Dear dan o'meara,

You need to read this again and then go get lost:

Your "identification" of Lovelady on the steps is based on a barely recognizable human face in Couch-Darnell and highly dubious witness statements. Your pivoting "Shelly" is probably Ochus V. Campbell, Vice-President and Secretary of the Texas School Book Depository Company. Campbell was standing in front of the steps near Roy Truly (who can also be seen standing in front of the steps in Couch-Darnell about 25 seconds after the final shot, watching Baker run past him to the steps) during the motorcade.

Your "identification" of Lovelady on the steps is based on a barely recognizable human face in Couch-Darnell and highly dubious witness statements.

If you cared about the evidence and read the posts properly you'd see this is not correct.
This is just your ranting opinion yet again.
Based on nothing more than 'what you think' is the case.
There is no challenge of the evidence I've put forward or the arguments emanating from that evidence.
Just thomas stamping his little foot and insisting 'it ain't so'.
Who do you think you are?
Just because you think you can insist something is the case without providing any supporting evidence, you expect everyone else to accept it and get upset when they don't.
Your identification of Lovelady has been blown out of the water by almost every single piece of evidence that has any bearing on this matter. But you don't care about the evidence, about what it means and how it refutes your 'it looks like Lovelady to me' routine.

You have no interest in debate or discussion so why don't you get lost.
Why don't you just run along.