Who Were the Two Men Heading *Down* the Stairs at NLT 12:50?

[Royell Storing]

Because you say so.

Whether the glove flopped around or not would depend on the stiffness of the glove. If that's a leather glove, and I think it would be, it's not going to flop around like a cloth glove. It seems a rather flimsy excuse for saying that cop is not Haygood.

     The missing glove vs the Cancellare Photo is one of Many Facts. The timelines of the film'd together, Haygood? + Harkness, + Walthers are also rock solid Facts. This is why a 2nd Haygood on foot, deep inside the railroad yard, has Now suddenly been invented. And this invented Haygood 2nd trip into the train yard, also changes the timeline of the Darnell film showing this motorcycle cop. But do you question any of this? Silly question.
     Getting back to that (L) hand, I do not see him holding a possible glove. Whatever he's holding has a circular shape and is flat on the bottom as held. If this guy was wearing a glove on his (R) hand, in your wildest dreams, would you think that object in his (L) hand was a glove?
     So now we suddenly have: (1) Haygood making a 2nd trip into the railroad yard, and, (2) a claimed motorcycle patrolman's "glove" that is somehow shaped like a cylinder.  ALL because I have proven "That Ain't Haygood"! 

[Tom Graves]

     The missing glove vs the Cancellare Photo is one of Many Facts. The timelines of the film'd together, Haygood? + Harkness, + Walthers are also rock solid Facts. This is why a 2nd Haygood on foot, deep inside the railroad yard, has Now suddenly been invented. And this invented Haygood 2nd trip into the train yard, also changes the timeline of the Darnell film showing this motorcycle cop. But do you question any of this? Silly question.
     Getting back to that (L) hand, I do not see him holding a possible glove. Whatever he's holding has a circular shape and is flat on the bottom as held. If this guy was wearing a glove on his (R) hand, in your wildest dreams, would you think that object in his (L) hand was a glove?
     So now we suddenly have: (1) Haygood making a 2nd trip into the railroad yard, and, (2) a claimed motorcycle patrolman's "glove" that is somehow shaped like a cylinder.  ALL because I have proven "That Ain't Haygood"!

Dear Royell,

Why are you trying so hard to "prove" that someone other than Lee Harvey Oswald killed "Commie Libtard" JFK?

If you'd been working at the TSBD at the time, wouldn't you, zombified MAGAT that you are, have tried to kill him yourself?

-- Tom

[Royell Storing]

Dear Royell,

Why are you trying so hard to "prove" that someone other than Lee Harvey Oswald killed "Commie Libtard" JFK?

If you'd been working at the TSBD at the time, wouldn't you, zombified MAGAT that you are, tried to kill him yourself?

-- Tom

   Proving a conspiracy thru the Impostor Motorcycle Cop, does Not mean Oswald was not part of this conspiracy. We know for a Fact: (1) A sniper's nest was constructed on the TSBD 6th Floor, and, (2) The Huge Gates granting clandestine access and exit from the TSBD were "wide open". Both of these are easily within Oswald's TSBD job function.

[Tommy Shanks]

   Proving a conspiracy thru the Impostor Motorcycle Cop, does Not mean Oswald was not part of this conspiracy. We know for a Fact: (1) A sniper's nest was constructed on the TSBD 6th Floor, and, (2) The Huge Gates granting clandestine access and exit from the TSBD were "wide open". Both of these are easily within Oswald's TSBD job function.

There's a big difference between a "fact" and what you, personally, consider one. You have "proven" diddly squat.. and in fact John Mytton has shown that your analysis is faulty in numerous ways.

[Zeon Mason]

Dear Royell,

Why are you trying so hard to "prove" that someone other than Lee Harvey Oswald killed "Commie Libtard" JFK?

If you'd been working at the TSBD at the time, wouldn't you, zombified MAGAT that you are, have tried to kill him yourself?

-- Tom

Dear Gravedigger,

Why would the avowed Marxist commie Oswald want to kill a commie libtard JFK? Seems kind of counterproductive unless Oswald really thought JFK was an America 1st type president. Maybe Oswald was suffering from Kennedy Derangement Syndrome LOL.

[Tom Graves]

Dear Gravedigger,

Why would the avowed Marxist commie Oswald want to kill a commie libtard JFK? Seems kind of counterproductive unless Oswald really thought JFK was an America 1st type president. Maybe Oswald was suffering from Kennedy Derangement Syndrome LOL.

Dear Freon,

Maybe the fact that former Marine sharpshooter Oswald had lived half-a-mile from a KGB school in Minsk for two-and-a-half years had something to do with it.

In which case you may want to read chapter ten of Mark Riebling's 1994 book, Wedge: The Secret War Between the FBI and CIA.

https://archive.org/details/WedgeFromPearlHarborTo911HowTheSecretWarBetweenTheFBIAndCIAHasEndangeredNationalSecurity

But even if those fine folks in the KGB hadn't encouraged or "programmed" Oswald to kill General Walker and JFK, as a self-described Marxist he could have come up with his own reasons.

-- Tom

[John Corbett]

Dear Gravedigger,

Why would the avowed Marxist commie Oswald want to kill a commie libtard JFK? Seems kind of counterproductive unless Oswald really thought JFK was an America 1st type president. Maybe Oswald was suffering from Kennedy Derangement Syndrome LOL.

JFK was anything but a libtard. In fact, he was the most conservative of the prominent candidates seeking the Democrat nomination for President in 1960. JFK was a friend and an ally of Nixon going back to their days as freshmen congressmen following their elections in 1946. JFK contributed $1000 to Nixon's Senate campaign in 1950. The Kennedys were close allies of Joe McCarthy even though they were from opposing parties. RFK was counsel on McCarthy's committee and McCarthy was godfather to RFK's first child. McCarthy even dated one the Kennedy sisters.

The liberal wing of the Democrat Party wanted anyone but Kennedy to lead the ticket. Truman was against him. Eleanor Roosevelt was so adamantly opposed to him that she refused to endorse him after he won the nomination, and only did so reluctantly late in the general election campaign. At first Humphrey opposed JFK in the primaries which back then only chose delegates in a few states. When Humphrey flamed out, the liberal wing turned to Stuart Symington as their hopeful. Some even wanted to give Adlai Stevenson a third bite of the apple. At the convention, the liberals were hoping LBJ and the southern Democrats could prevent JFK from getting a first ballot nomination and they could broker the convention to put a liberal at the top of the ticket. In the end all these efforts failed, much to the chagrin of the liberals.

[John Corbett]

Dear Gravedigger,

Why would the avowed Marxist commie Oswald want to kill a commie libtard JFK? Seems kind of counterproductive unless Oswald really thought JFK was an America 1st type president. Maybe Oswald was suffering from Kennedy Derangement Syndrome LOL.

Why would we think crackpots think logically. Why did Mark Chapman kill John Lennon. Why did Charles Whitman climb the clock tower on the University of Texas campus and kill about dozen people at random and wound many more. Why do any of these rampage shooters do what they do. It makes no sense. Oswald had a motive. We just don't know what it was. It's fun to guess but we will never know. I have my own guess but that guess is no more or less valid than anybody else's. It is not necessary to prove motive in order to convict someone of murder. It can be useful in establishing premeditation, but still not necessary. The WC briefly speculated about possible motives for Oswald while recognizing it was speculation. They came to no conclusion about motive nor was it necessary to do so. They gave us ample evidence that Oswald committed the act. That's all we really need to know.