Which is more plausible?

[Tom Graves]

Which is more plausible?

That a former Marine sharpshooter with a "clunky"-but-accurate bolt-action rifle at the TSBD's sixth-floor south-east-corner window killed JFK by hitting him with two shots fired about five seconds apart at 80 and 90 yards, respectively, while JFK was moving slowly and almost directly away down a slight grade in an open convertible

--OR--

That Oswald was just a "patsy," and there were actually TWO shooters, one of whom fired from the above-described "Sniper's Nest" (or from a building behind the TSBD to make it look as though he had), and that they and oodles and gobs of their co-conspirators framed the former Marine sharpshooter by planting false evidence against him and have succeeded in covering up their participation in the assassination to this day?

[Tom Graves]

Which is more plausible?

That a former Marine sharpshooter with a "clunky"-but-accurate bolt-action rifle at the TSBD's sixth-floor south-east-corner window killed JFK by hitting him with two shots fired about five seconds apart at 80 and 90 yards, respectively, while JFK was moving slowly and almost directly away down a slight grade in an open convertible

--OR--

That Oswald was just a "patsy," and there were actually TWO shooters, one of whom fired from the above-described "Sniper's Nest" (or from a building behind the TSBD to make it look as though he had), and that they and oodles and gobs of their co-conspirators framed the former Marine sharpshooter by planting false evidence against him and have succeeded in covering up their participation in the assassination to this day?

It must have been the latter, right?

LOL!