Addressing Griffith's Zapruder Fakery. Jackie & Hill on Trunk

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Addressing Griffith's Zapruder Fakery. Jackie & Hill on Trunk  (Read 9268 times)

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5005
Re: Addressing Griffith's Zapruder Fakery. Jackie & Hill on Trunk
« Reply #14 on: July 09, 2025, 04:06:13 PM »

  This is what they always do. When jammed up with conflicting JFK Assassination images, they claim there is a "perspective" issue. And then they accuse You of being Mr Magoo. Same old, same old.

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3495
Re: Addressing Griffith's Zapruder Fakery. Jackie & Hill on Trunk
« Reply #15 on: July 09, 2025, 10:06:19 PM »
Again, I answered you and Organ on this issue. Your whole argument boils down to claiming that the difference in camera angles explains the serious and readily apparent conflict between Jackie's position in relation Hill in Z375/380 and her position in the corresponding Nix frame. IOW, you're saying this serious conflict is really just a remarkable optical illusion caused by the difference in the camera angles. And I say that this argument is invalid, that the camera angles are not different enough to explain the obvious conflict between Z375/380 and the Nix frame.

Griffith,

Please remind me.

How many bad guys and bad gals do you figure were involved, altogether, in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, the getting-away, the film-and x-ray-altering, and the all-important (and continuing!!!) cover up?

Just a few, or oodles and gobs?