No one cares about your book "review".
Nothing I said is "wrong".
The two witnesses who stated that the killer touched the door were Helen Markham and Jimmy Burt. Markham was on the wrong side of the street to make that determination. Burt was also on the other side of the street and roughly 400 feet away. Burt's angle suggests that he could have seen the killer touch the door, had the killer indeed done so. So, if Jimmy Burt says it, it must be true?
The point I was leading up to (but ignored by the thread's creator) is that just because Jimmy Burt said the killer put his hands on the door doesn't mean it's a fact that the killer indeed placed his hands on the door.
Jimmy Burt also stated that when Tippit pulled up alongside the guy, he (Tippit) leaned over and rolled down the window. The window was NOT rolled down. Burt made an assumption about the window and therefore could have made an assumption about the killer touching the door.