Euins is an assassination eyewitness that claims he saw shots being fired from the TSBD 6th Floor sniper's nest. He claimed he crouched next to the Glover Pedestal for cover. Glover directly refutes his Pedestal story. You do Not believe a key JFK Assassination eyewitness being discredited is "significant"? This, and your blanket rejecting any memory dating back before 1965 would make your being seated on a jury an extremely tough sell.
The Glover Pedestal? Is there a plaque there now?

I want to tread lightly, because I don't want to appear to be engaging in character assassination of Toni Glover. The fact is, Amos Lee Euins told his story the day of the JFKA, was interviewed twice by the FBI, and testified to the WC. Yes, he wasn't 100% consistent, but after all that I find it difficult to believe a 15-year-old Black kid was telling whoppers about where he was. Toni Glover says nothing until the mid-1990s, 30 years after the JFKA, surfaces in a much larger way around the 50th anniversary (including appearing at the Lancer conference), is now writing or has written a book about being "The Girl in Blue." and is doing her third interview for the Sixth Floor Museum and clearly enjoying her moment in the sun. She "directly refutes" Euins' account with "memories" that are 50 or more years old and relate to a moment in time when she was 11 years old. Her assertion that she would have noticed and recalled Euins if he'd been there seems highly unlikely to me. There were some 72,000 Blacks in Dallas in 1963; they weren't exactly scarce. Yes, if I were on a jury I would be an extremely tough sell for Glover's "memories" having any bearing at all on where Euins actually was. On this point, what she says about Euins amounts to no more than "Hey, I was an 11-year-old kid at the time and 30-50 years later I have no recollection of him." OK, whoop-de-doo.