Two Wallets? Nope.

[Lance Payette]

You can tell a fool that he is a fool but he will never believe or accept it. 

May the record reflect, Your Honor, that the sock puppet known as "Tom Sorenson" has not appeared on the forum since the moment I outed "him" in my sock puppet thread.

His final post, directed at moi, was as follows:

This is basically about how badly you crave attention, and it's bad. As high as eight ramblings a day at one time, now roughly five. It's the ego thing, case closed.

"CASE CLOSED" INDEED, TEAM SOCK PUPPET.

The prosecution rests. But, hey, keep tap-dancing if it makes you happy, Martin & The Elves. We're laughing at you, not with you.

[Martin Weidmann]

You're joking right? Hahaha!

A wallet dropped at the Tippit crime scene and you don't think that would be highly suspicious to a Policeman looking for clues, surely you jest?

JohnM

How did Westbrook know that the wallet was dropped and not just simply lost by a witness?

And since when does "highly suspicious" equal calling somebody a potential murderer?

You do understand that being suspicious isn't an actual crime, don't you? Oh wait, you probably do not understand that. Forget I asked.

[Martin Weidmann]

What happened to Tom? LOLOL!

Everytime a sock puppet is exposed they just disappear, poof, into another dimension, a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind; a journey into a wondrous land whose boundaries are that of imagination.

JohnM

What happened to Tom? LOLOL!

You don't know what happened to your alter ego? Really?

Perhaps you should ask Vincent Baxter. He suddenly showed up (without posting) after three years after I mentioned him and connected him to you.

Everytime a sock puppet is exposed they just disappear, poof, into another dimension,

Yeah, you know all about that, don't you? And guess what, I'm still here.... 

[John Mytton]

What happened to Tom? LOLOL!

You don't know what happened to your alter ego? Really?

Perhaps you should ask Vincent Baxter. He suddenly showed up (without posting) after three years after I mentioned him and connected him to you.

Everytime a sock puppet is exposed they just disappear, poof, into another dimension,

Yeah, you know all about that, don't you? And guess what, I'm still here.... 

You've been caught and are now making irrational nonsensical statements. Hilarious.

Too bad that Vincent didn't just disappear but was online just before Lance exposed you and the last time that you mentioned Vincent Baxter before that was THREE years ago. Oops.

The more you try to squirm your way out of your lies, the deeper hole you dig.

JohnM

[John Mytton]

How did Westbrook know that the wallet was dropped and not just simply lost by a witness?

And since when does "highly suspicious" equal calling somebody a potential murderer?

You do understand that being suspicious isn't an actual crime, don't you? Oh wait, you probably do not understand that. Forget I asked.

Yeah, those silly witnesses are dropping their wallets at crime scenes, happens everyday.

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

You've been caught and are now making irrational nonsensical statements. Hilarious.

Too bad that Vincent didn't just disappear but was online just before Lance exposed you and the last time that you mentioned Vincent Baxter before that was THREE years ago. Oops.

The more you try to squirm your way out of your lies, the deeper hole you dig.

JohnM

Well, I figured out three years ago that Vincent Baxter was your alter ego. That was the day he disappeared. 

So, I had no reason to talk about him after that.

Besides, I don't care that an internet troll like you is hiding behind a fake name and is using other accounts.

The real question to answer is; why are you so easy to provoke? 

Btw, the tag-team thing you've got going with Lance is rather amusing. Perhaps you should get another lap top so that you and Lance can post at the same time.

[Martin Weidmann]

Yeah, those silly witnesses are dropping their wallets at crime scenes, happens everyday.

JohnM

Wow, dissent in the ranks... There have been plenty of LNs, like "Richard Smith" who claim to believe (they don't really   ) that the wallet was dropped by a witness.
Your disagreement might just get you recalled to Langley!

But let me ask you this;

You seem to have accepted that in the television footage it shows Westbrook looking at a wallet.
So, if the wallet wasn't dropped by a witness, then who dropped it there?

[John Mytton]

Wow, dissent in the ranks... There have been plenty of LNs, like "Richard Smith" who claim to believe (they don't really   ) that the wallet was dropped by a witness.
Your disagreement might just get you recalled to Langley!

But let me ask you this;

You seem to have accepted that in the television footage it shows Westbrook looking at a wallet.
So, if the wallet wasn't dropped by a witness, then who dropped it there?

1. Can you point to the post where Richard said the wallet was dropped by an witness because he said in this thread that finding a discarded wallet at the scene would be a "bizarre coincidence"? Richard has also speculated that it wasn't a wallet but was Tippit's notebook.

2. I analysed the footage in a post earlier in this thread and said the wallet was being given back to an eyewitness who obviously was not Hidell or Oswald.

JohnM