Two Wallets? Nope.

[John Mytton]

What happened to Tom? LOLOL!

You don't know what happened to your alter ego? Really?

Perhaps you should ask Vincent Baxter. He suddenly showed up (without posting) after three years after I mentioned him and connected him to you.

Everytime a sock puppet is exposed they just disappear, poof, into another dimension,

Yeah, you know all about that, don't you? And guess what, I'm still here.... 

You've been caught and are now making irrational nonsensical statements. Hilarious.

Too bad that Vincent didn't just disappear but was online just before Lance exposed you and the last time that you mentioned Vincent Baxter before that was THREE years ago. Oops.

The more you try to squirm your way out of your lies, the deeper hole you dig.

JohnM

[John Mytton]

How did Westbrook know that the wallet was dropped and not just simply lost by a witness?

And since when does "highly suspicious" equal calling somebody a potential murderer?

You do understand that being suspicious isn't an actual crime, don't you? Oh wait, you probably do not understand that. Forget I asked.

Yeah, those silly witnesses are dropping their wallets at crime scenes, happens everyday.

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

You've been caught and are now making irrational nonsensical statements. Hilarious.

Too bad that Vincent didn't just disappear but was online just before Lance exposed you and the last time that you mentioned Vincent Baxter before that was THREE years ago. Oops.

The more you try to squirm your way out of your lies, the deeper hole you dig.

JohnM

Well, I figured out three years ago that Vincent Baxter was your alter ego. That was the day he disappeared. 

So, I had no reason to talk about him after that.

Besides, I don't care that an internet troll like you is hiding behind a fake name and is using other accounts.

The real question to answer is; why are you so easy to provoke? 

Btw, the tag-team thing you've got going with Lance is rather amusing. Perhaps you should get another lap top so that you and Lance can post at the same time.

[Martin Weidmann]

Yeah, those silly witnesses are dropping their wallets at crime scenes, happens everyday.

JohnM

Wow, dissent in the ranks... There have been plenty of LNs, like "Richard Smith" who claim to believe (they don't really   ) that the wallet was dropped by a witness.
Your disagreement might just get you recalled to Langley!

But let me ask you this;

You seem to have accepted that in the television footage it shows Westbrook looking at a wallet.
So, if the wallet wasn't dropped by a witness, then who dropped it there?

[John Mytton]

Wow, dissent in the ranks... There have been plenty of LNs, like "Richard Smith" who claim to believe (they don't really   ) that the wallet was dropped by a witness.
Your disagreement might just get you recalled to Langley!

But let me ask you this;

You seem to have accepted that in the television footage it shows Westbrook looking at a wallet.
So, if the wallet wasn't dropped by a witness, then who dropped it there?

1. Can you point to the post where Richard said the wallet was dropped by an witness because he said in this thread that finding a discarded wallet at the scene would be a "bizarre coincidence"? Richard has also speculated that it wasn't a wallet but was Tippit's notebook.

2. I analysed the footage in a post earlier in this thread and said the wallet was being given back to an eyewitness who obviously was not Hidell or Oswald.

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

1. Can you point to the post where Richard said the wallet was dropped by an witness because he said in this thread that finding a discarded wallet at the scene would be a "bizarre coincidence"? Richard has also speculated that it wasn't a wallet but was Tippit's notebook.

2. I analysed the footage in a post earlier in this thread and said the wallet was being given back to an eyewitness who obviously was not Hidell or Oswald.

JohnM

So, you agree it was a wallet that Westbrook was looking at on 10th street? That's progress.

[John Mytton]

So, you agree it was a wallet that Westbrook was looking at on 10th street? That's progress.

In this video of the wallet at the Tippit crime scene, the cop with the wallet is randomly waving his gun and without a care even has it aimed close to the hand of the detective who is pointing something out within the wallet and then when the cop hands over the wallet, he quickly points the gun away and more towards himself.
The most likely scenario imo is that the wallet was being looked at legitimately and also as a bit of a show for the TV camera and thus the cop is a bit flippant with the direction of his gun but when the civilian is given his wallet back, the cop responds correctly by diverting the aim of the gun and away from the direction of this civilian.



BTW, I posted this theory on the old Forum and Gary Mack who became a wise wizard, sent me a PM endorsing my theory.

JohnM