Two Wallets? Nope.

[Martin Weidmann]

Save up all your questions and you can present your case when you and Bill have your online debate.

JohnM

Give it a break, Mytton.

Brown didn't answer a single question in our mini debate. He's also not answering questions on this board. I'm not going to waste my time debating him again.

[Michael Capasse]

Sure does Michael, we can add that evidence to the case against Oswald, Good work!

JohnM

  Provide another lame excuse for the wallet in his pocket and you're good to go.
BTW, completely searched in the car: NO bus pass , No bullets - Uh oh

[John Mytton]

Provide another lame excuse for the wallet in is pocket and you're good to go.
BTW, completely searched in the car: NO bus pass , No bullets - Uh oh

Provide another lame excuse for the wallet in is pocket and you're good to go.

You can't be serious and this desperate!

There was always only one Oswald wallet, but if you want anyone to believe your fairy tale you've first got to explain;

1) Why would the conspirators plant an extra wallet when as you say, Oswald as is customary had a wallet in his pocket? DOH!
2) If the plan was to frame Oswald, why on Earth did the DP hide the evidence of the wallet at the Tippit crime scene? Double DOH!
3) Why wasn't the name in the wallet broadcast on the Police radio IMMEDIATELY which was well before Oswald's arrest? Triple DOH!
4) Why wasn't the wallet in any Police reports? Quadruple DOH!
5) Why did it take decades till this extra wallet was known about? Quintuple DOH!
6) How could anyone predict ahead of time that Oswald would be in the vicinity and be positively identified by a stack of Eyewitnesses? Sextuple DOH!

Good luck giving a plausible narrative that fits? Hahahaha!

BTW, completely searched in the car: NO bus pass , No bullets - Uh oh

Hilarious, so they didn't find a piece of paper, what did you expect Oswald to do with his Bus Transfer, give them all one heck of a paper cut? 
They had Oswald's weapon and you think the DP "completely searched" Oswald while he was wedged in the back seat? You can't make this up! 

JohnM

[Michael Capasse]

You can't be serious and this desperate!

There was always only one Oswald wallet, but if you want anyone to believe your fairy tale you've first got to explain;

1) Why would the conspirators plant an extra wallet when as you say, Oswald as is customary had a wallet in his pocket? DOH!
2) If the plan was to frame Oswald, why on Earth did the DP hide the evidence of the wallet at the Tippit crime scene? Double DOH!
3) Why wasn't the name in the wallet broadcast on the Police radio IMMEDIATELY which was well before Oswald's arrest? Triple DOH!
4) Why wasn't the wallet in any Police reports? Quadruple DOH!
5) Why did it take decades till this extra wallet was known about? Quintuple DOH!
6) How could anyone predict ahead of time that Oswald would be in the vicinity and be positively identified by a stack of Eyewitnesses? Sextuple DOH!

Good luck giving a plausible narrative that fits? Hahahaha!

Hilarious, so they didn't find a piece of paper, what did you expect Oswald to do with his Bus Transfer, give them all one heck of a paper cut? 
They had Oswald's weapon and you think the DP "completely searched" Oswald while he was wedged in the back seat? You can't make this up! 

JohnM

  Distraction, every one. Could never satisfy your preset bias conclusion - waste of time.
Doesn't mean a thing.

[John Mytton]

Give it a break, Mytton.

Brown didn't answer a single question in our mini debate. He's also not answering questions on this board. I'm not going to waste my time debating him again.

Brown didn't answer a single question in our mini debate. He's also not answering questions on this board.

You clearly don't know how a debate works.
Bill presents his evidence and you in turn present your evidence, and the LNers, CT's and interested others will declare a winner see how easy that is!

I'm not going to waste my time debating him again.

YAWN! You keep saying that but every time Bill posts anything re Tippit, you're always replying and voicing your disapproval, just have a proper debate and prove that you know the case better than Bill. Easy Peasy.

JohnM

[John Mytton]

Distraction, every one. Could never satisfy your preset bias conclusion - waste of time.
Doesn't mean a thing.

So in other words you don't where your evidence of a decades old memory goes and you can't provide a suitable narrative that fits but you're damn sure it means something, something conspiratorial? Muhahaha!

JohnM

[Michael Capasse]

....suitable narrative....?

JohnM

You've been trying for 60+ years. - how's that going?