JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
The Warren Commission Sham
Lance Payette:
No one else ever seems to be, but I was always impressed with a Carcano bullet penetrating 31" of solid pine and being more pristine than CE 399 when it was retrieved. Do I think CE 399, both its condition and its discovery, is problematical? Sure. Is CE 399 a deal-breaker? The very fact that its condition and discovery are problematical argues in favor of authenticity. What sort of whacked-out conspirators would have crafted the scenario of a suspiciously clean bullet being found in dubious circumstances at Parkland? Again, it's the same old story of the conspirators being Geniuses as the conspiracy theory requires and Dolts as the theory requires.
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Lance Payette on April 01, 2025, 06:22:23 PM ---No one else ever seems to be, but I was always impressed with a Carcano bullet penetrating 31" of solid pine and being more pristine than CE 399 when it was retrieved. Do I think CE 399, both its condition and its discovery, is problematical? Sure. Is CE 399 a deal-breaker? The very fact that its condition and discovery are problematical argues in favor of authenticity. What sort of whacked-out conspirators would have crafted the scenario of a suspiciously clean bullet being found in dubious circumstances at Parkland? Again, it's the same old story of the conspirators being Geniuses as the conspiracy theory requires and Dolts as the theory requires.
--- End quote ---
When I watched the PBS NOVA special, "Cold Case JFK," I was very impressed by the penetration and physical stability of that kind of bullet when fired from LHO's kind of short-rifle. I was also impressed by the fact that it has a tendency to start tumbling upon exiting something soft -- like a block of ballistics gel or a human neck.
Dan O'meara:
--- Quote from: Tom Graves on April 01, 2025, 05:43:32 PM ---How many of the other forensic pathologists on the panel of nine agreed with him?
--- End quote ---
The point was you said one guy said this I said one guy said the opposite. So what?
The bullet on the far right is a bullet that hit a wrist bone.
That's evidence.
That's what CE399 should've looked like.
--- Quote ---Was the muzzle velocity of any of those test bullets significantly reduced (to compensate for the fact that CE-399 had already passed through JFK's lower neck and JBC's chest), and were any of them already tumbling when they sideswiped the cadaver's radial bone?
--- End quote ---
Just to clear up your use of the word "sideswiped".
Is it your understanding that the tumbling bullet passed straight through JBC's radial bone or did the tumbling bullet just glance the bone?
Your use of the word "sideswiped" seems to suggest it was just a glancing blow.
Note - the wrist bone has been shattered into multiple pieces.
Note - there is no sign of a hole through which the tumbling bullet passed.
Note - there are multiple metal fragments in a non-linear spread.
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Dan O'meara on April 02, 2025, 12:57:38 AM ---The point was you said one guy said this I said one guy said the opposite. So what?
--- End quote ---
Do you think those eight other forensic pathologists were controlled by the evil, evil CIA?
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Dan O'meara on April 02, 2025, 12:57:38 AM ---The point was you said one guy said this I said one guy said the opposite. So what?
The bullet on the far right is a bullet that hit a wrist bone.
That's evidence.
That's what CE399 should've looked like.
--- End quote ---
Except the bullet on the right hit the radial bone neither the same way (tumbling / twirling) nor as slowly as CE-399 did.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version