In return, I'll give you the standard script that all LN-evangelists follow.
- first they claim as a fact that Oswald did it
- then when challenged to prove it, they regurgitate the official made-up narrative
- when asked what their evidence is that the narrative is true, they say “see the Warren Commission Report”
- when you point out that “see the Warren Report” is not evidence, but rather an appeal to authority, they then trot out the usual laundry list of non-evidence and false, misleading, and unsubstantiated claims about the evidence by cutting and pasting quotes from Bugliosi, Posner, McAdams, Von Pein, or Myers.
- when it’s pointed out to them that claims are not evidence, that the evidence does not support the claims, and what all the discrepancies, contradictions, and authenticity issues there are that are endemic to the case, they then trot out “oh yeah, then you have to prove that I’m wrong or prove that somebody else did it”.
- when you point out that shifting the burden is a logical fallacy and that the person making the claim has the burden of proof, and that an inability to prove something different does absolutely nothing to prove their claim that Oswald did it, then they insult you and/or block you and declare victory.
And that’s the best-case scenario. Usually they just jump right to the insult.
