Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.  (Read 165210 times)

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.
« Reply #231 on: January 20, 2025, 03:58:56 PM »
Given the fact that the Single Bullet Hypothesis is correct, how would you have demonstrated it if you were Specter?

Put a couple of guys in an identical (LOL) car and have a sniper in the 6th floor window shoot at them with Oswald's short-rifle?

    So you wanna argue with Forensic SCIENCE?  SCIENCE vs a Theory slapped together by an aspiring Lawyer inna basement? This is where you are.

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3495
Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.
« Reply #232 on: January 20, 2025, 04:07:27 PM »
Also, in the Hughes film where motion was seen in the sniper's window, do you guys recall if the motion observed was left/right, up/down, or just some generic motion, and if Oswald was standing at that point given widow sizes would his head have been positioned in the upper windowpane as seen from street level?

Upon viewing that digitally enhanced Hughes clip again in "The Lost Bullet," for me any movement is hard-to-impossible to discern, and it seems as though the film technician guy was noncommittal as to whether or not there was movement in the window, whereas Max Holland was certain that there was.

Try to find "JFK The Lost Bullet" on Vimeo. If you find it, start watching it at 27:47 to see what you think.
 
« Last Edit: January 20, 2025, 04:23:03 PM by Tom Mahon »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.
« Reply #233 on: January 20, 2025, 04:13:15 PM »
Thank you for proving my point that that's how Oswald managed to miss everything with his first shot -- which was even harder than you experienced in your reenactment because it was half-a-second earlier at "Z-124," and therefore at an even steeper downward angle.

   I agree with you here. That cartoon visual aid is not close to demonstrating the extremely steep angle relative to the Light Signal/Support Beam of the alleged 1st shot. This is why Max Holland was forced to discretely have the shooter Standing Up and leaning forward as he fired shot #1. Maxy tries to "slight of hand" this in his "Lost Bullet" presentation, but he's no David Copperfield. Some of us caught it at Jump St. 

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.
« Reply #234 on: January 20, 2025, 04:21:56 PM »
Thank you for proving my point that that's how Oswald managed to miss everything with his first shot -- which was even harder than you experienced in your reenactment because it was half-a-second earlier at "Z-124," and therefore at an even steeper downward angle.


By my rough calculations based on Don Roberdeau’s map, and a guesstimated Z124 position, giving any doubt to the largest possible difference, I came up with about 4’ closer to the building. This calculates to about a whopping 1.6 degrees steeper angle. Which is insignificant as it relates to the difficulty of the shot in my opinion.    :-\

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.
« Reply #235 on: January 20, 2025, 04:26:55 PM »
   I agree with you here. That cartoon visual aid is not close to demonstrating the extremely steep angle relative to the Light Signal/Support Beam of the alleged 1st shot. This is why Max Holland was forced to discretely have the shooter Standing Up and leaning forward as he fired shot #1. Maxy tries to "slight of hand" this in his "Lost Bullet" presentation, but he's no David Copperfield. Some of us caught it at Jump St.

Roughly 40.2-degrees looking up from the street to the sniper’s nest window and 49.8-degrees down from level from the sniper’s nest by my quick estimate. Others have very accurate models of Dealey Plaza, the TSBD, and the sniper’s nest. And could provide more accurate calculations if they have a mind to do so.

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3495
Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.
« Reply #236 on: January 20, 2025, 04:28:53 PM »
So you wanna argue with Forensic SCIENCE?  SCIENCE vs a Theory slapped together by an aspiring Lawyer inna basement? This is where you are.

When you say forensic science, do you mean the fact that that kind of bullet always starts tumbling when it exits something soft like a block of ballistics gel or a human neck, and the fact that the entry wound in JBC's back was oblong in shape?

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.
« Reply #237 on: January 20, 2025, 04:41:12 PM »

By my rough calculations based on Don Roberdeau’s map, and a guesstimated Z124 position, giving any doubt to the largest possible difference, I came up with about 4’ closer to the building. This calculates to about a whopping 1.6 degrees steeper angle. Which is insignificant as it relates to the difficulty of the shot in my opinion.    :-\

    Your attention should be focused on the angle from the 1/2 open window to the Signal Light/Support Beam. This is what Holland claimed the bullet struck/glanced off of.