John instead of the little word games you like to play, why don't you explain to me what would fire a projectile that would only penetrate an inch. And then explain to me why someone would be so stupid as to try and shoot the president with a weapon that would only go in an inch. You realize how stupid that is do you not? Besides Royell is the one that claimed it was a bullet. But now he has to explain why the wound to the throat only went in an inch or two. I'm sorry I can't stop laughing over your question? I thought I had found a serious site to debate the assassination. Evidently it is a comedy site.
Of course you're laughing. You think all of your wild-ass assumptions should just be accepted as true.
How should I know what projectile would only penetrate an inch? That depends a lot on what it was, how fast it was going, where it came from, if it hit anything in between, and a whole bunch of other factors. The Sibert and O'Neill report says that the end of the opening could be felt with a finger. They were listening to what Humes was saying and writing it down. By the way, how did "could be felt with a finger" turn into "an inch"?
