Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory

[Tim Nickerson]

Huh?

So the notations on the face sheet are accurate but the face sheet itself wasn't drawn to scale and thus isn't accurate?

That is correct.

[Royell Storing]

He didn't make a mistake. He just wasn't being precise when he placed that mark on it.

Are Autopsy Face Sheets Supposed to be Drawn to Scale?

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/toscale.htm

        Yeah. Why would an autopsy Dr bother to be "precise" concerning the location of wound(s) on an ASSASSINATED POTUS

[Bill Chapman]

Scale refers to accuracy.

These brainiacs apparently think the generic face sheet was an accurate drawing of Kennedy's shoulders.

Sloped, they ain't.

[Gary Craig]

You're still not answering the question. Not directly anyway.

I'm answering. You're just not listening. Or don't have the ability to comprehend that JFK's physician's     

11/22/63 signed autopsy trumps O'Connor's 14 year old recollection.

Do you believe the farther a witness gets, time wise, from an event the better their memory of that event?

[John Mytton]

I'm answering. You're just not listening. Or don't have the ability to comprehend that JFK's physician's     

11/22/63 signed autopsy trumps O'Connor's 14 year old recollection.

Do you believe the farther a witness gets, time wise, from an event the better their memory of that event?

At the end of the day the accurate measurements are written on the face sheet and must take precedence.
I think when they took the measurement that we see on the face sheet they also took the following photograph using the ruler as verification.



Btw the face sheet shows the classic anatomical position which is replicated by the lying down Kennedy.



JohnM

[Mike Orr]

To place a mark 1/4 the way down the back of JFK and then place a mark at the base of the back of the neck because there was a mistake made in placing the bullet hole the first time around is missing the mark by quite a distance and of course if you stuck your finger in that entry wound that was supposedly at the base of the back of the neck and still only went as deep as a knuckle and stopped because you couldn't go any further, then the fact of the matter was that there was no CE 399 because there was no bullet that transversed the body on JFK except for the frontal head shot that blew the back of JFK's head out. Nurse Hall saw the bullet that was between the ear and the shoulder in JFK. As John Connally said , " I heard the first shot so I know that bullet didn't hit me " and the Zapruder film itself shows there was no immediate movement of Connally being struck by a bullet until a moment later , when he is hit by a different shot. The 1st shot was a front entry shot to Kennedy's neck and we know that bullet could not possibly hit Connally because it was going the other way ! I wish Arlen Specter would have told the truth before he died. I think E. Howard Hunt was the only one who put some names to the guilty. Not telling the truth about what really happened using that old " For National Security " reasons does not work anymore. All of LBJ's problems went away that November day in 63 and he became the President which is a job he would have never been voted into .

[Tim Nickerson]

I'm answering. You're just not listening.

Gary, you lost track of what we were talking about. We were talking about O'Connor and his statements.

Or don't have the ability to comprehend that JFK's physician's     

11/22/63 signed autopsy trumps O'Connor's 14 year old recollection.

Do you believe the farther a witness gets, time wise, from an event the better their memory of that event?

JFK's physician never performed an autopsy.